Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday December 16 2016, @02:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the just-a-mattter-of-time dept.

The world’s oldest water, which is locked deep within the Earth’s crust, just got even older.

The liquid was discovered deep down in a mine in Canada in 2013 and is about 1.5 billion years old.

But now, at the same site, University of Toronto scientists have found a deeper source of water that is at least 500 million years more ancient.

The work was presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting in San Francisco.

Professor Barbara Sherwood Lollar, who led the team that made the discovery, told BBC News: “When people think about this water they assume it must be some tiny amount of water trapped within the rock.

“But in fact it’s very much bubbling right up out at you. These things are flowing at rates of litres per minute - the volume of the water is much larger than anyone anticipated.”

In your face, Peru!


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 16 2016, @04:48PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 16 2016, @04:48PM (#442094)

    In order to preserve and ration a resource, its value to the world must be determined; that's the whole point of an economy: To figure out the best way for society to appropriate resources; under a Free Market, the solution is brought into existence under evolution, without requiring an Intelligent Designer.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Friday December 16 2016, @05:28PM

    by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Friday December 16 2016, @05:28PM (#442114) Journal

    Price =/= value. I bet you'd tear down the coliseum to build a shopping mall if the price was right.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by bob_super on Friday December 16 2016, @06:51PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Friday December 16 2016, @06:51PM (#442151)

      A mall in place of the Coliseum? I wouldn't.

      Banks and McDonalds have better return per square metre. The rest can be luxury condos.

  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Friday December 16 2016, @10:25PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Friday December 16 2016, @10:25PM (#442249)

    The free market, if such a thing had ever existed outside an economist's dreams, only allocates resources in the most economically efficient manner. To claim that that is the "best" or "most valuable" manner is making an unsubstantiated leap of faith, as there is precious little evidence to suggest that economic efficiency correlates particularly well with any moral, ethical, or aesthetic definition of "good", at least once you get beyond the level of basic survival.