Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday December 16 2016, @05:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-photos? dept.

The Freedom of the Press Foundation has called on professional camera makers to implement encryption in cameras to prevent governments from easily searching and seizing the contents:

An open letter written by the Freedom of the Press Foundation and signed by over 150 filmmakers and photojournalists calls on professional camera makers such as Nikon, Canon, Olympus, and Fuji to enable encryption to protect confidential videos from seizure by oppressive governments or criminals. The Freedom of the Press Foundation is a non-profit organization that has several noteworthy members, such as "Pentagon Papers" Daniel Ellsberg, Edward Snowden, and EFF's co-founder John Perry Barlow, on its board of directors.

[...] Filmmakers and photojournalists that film documentaries or shoot photos of abuses committed by governments or terrorists in dangerous parts of the world are constantly under threat of having their videos and photos seized and destroyed. The danger is even bigger when these bad actors can see what's on the cameras--it's not just the documentation of abuses that is exposed, but also the confidential sources that may have wanted to keep their identities hidden. Encryption would ensure those who seize their cameras couldn't see the contents of the cameras, nor the journalists' sources.

This won't necessarily ensure that the information collected by journalists is disseminated, since border agents and law enforcement officers can just destroy encrypted equipment. For that, cloud storage or live streaming features are needed, as well as reliable access to the Internet even during times of political crisis and network shutdowns.

Also at The Register, CNET, and TechCrunch (they also found a small cameramaker that is planning to ship on-camera encryption).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Friday December 16 2016, @09:03PM

    by Scruffy Beard 2 (6030) on Friday December 16 2016, @09:03PM (#442204)

    To frustrate bad actors and authorities, the files should be encrypted before you run into trouble. Encrypting a 64GB card would just take too long.

    An "oh shit button" can me useful for deleting symmetric encryption keys from memory. As has been pointed out, with Public Key cryptography, the decryption key may be on another continent.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by dyingtolive on Friday December 16 2016, @10:12PM

    by dyingtolive (952) on Friday December 16 2016, @10:12PM (#442243)

    Actually, it's kind of a moot point, at least for the preview function on my T5i. I just popped the sd card out and gave it a few clicks. It will display the preview even with no storage, so it's pulling that from buffer, not the card. Surprised it will even try to snap the picture without a card, but it at least warns you on-screen (assuming you have the screen flipped out).

    Of course, displaying AFTER that second or so initial preview might be tricky. I do agree that encrypting an entire card as whatever villain this scenario is worried about is walking toward you would probably be a bit too late though.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!