Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Friday December 16 2016, @11:51PM   Printer-friendly
from the inquiries-cannot-be-stopped dept.

A Code Of Conduct is a contentious issue but has become common within some of the more progressive software projects (Gnome, Ruby On Rails) and some computer conferences. While some people see it as an essential method to combat casual discrimination, others see it as a trap to oust developers of successful projects. Some of our regulars would regard a Code Of Conduct as somewhere between frivolous and detrimental. But, really, what's wrong with "Don't be a dick" (or, admittedly, something more polite and inclusive) as popularized by Wil Wheaton?

Well, one group of victims of child sexual abuse are boycotting a UK inquiry because participation requires agreement to a Code Of Conduct. I can appreciate this is a very emotive issue even for people not directly affected by abuse and that making allegations publicly can be detrimental to the common law concept of innocent until proven guilty. However, the CoC is the latest incident in an ongoing shambles. The inquiry is currently on its fourth publicly named chairperson, more junior people have quit due to allegations of abuse between staff and £1.5 million has been spent on implementing a case management system. The inquiry has been running for more two years and is likely to cost more than £100 million. The first hearings begin in Feb 2017.

Maybe they're being really careful with conflicts of interests and victim privacy? A quick browse around the website finds that it is aimed at the legal eagles and that victims are most relegated to one subdirectory. Did I mention privacy? Well, the site's privacy is dubious. The homepage currently has an embedded YouTube video, so anyone showing an interest in the matter, for whatever reason, may have their name, email address, postal address and telephone number(s) collated by a Premiere PRISM Partner.

Despite the boycott, the inquiry has 2000 participants and this could grow significantly. One UK celebrity is believed to have sexually abused more than 650 victims; ranging from eight year old boys to 80 year old women plus rumours of necrophilia. A senior politician abused residents of the boys home that he'd founded and dossiers covering broader allegations disappeared. One town with a population of 110,000 people is believed to have 1400 girls who were sexually abused over 16 years. In this case, five abusers went to trial and were convicted. However, The Times of London found that much abuse in Rotherham was ignored and evidence was destroyed for political expediency.

Disclosure: Previous comment about child privacy. Previous comment about adult privacy. "Think of the children!" "Think of the imaginary children!"


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Saturday December 17 2016, @01:21AM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Saturday December 17 2016, @01:21AM (#442307) Homepage

    It's fitting that the person who invented the phrase was told "Shut up, Wesley!" over and over again during his career.

    I picture him going to a bar and ending up curled on the floor in the fetal position and in tears while the crowd laughs and points at him, saying Shut up, Wesley! I bet Wil has even punched one or two of his friends after receiving that treatment in jest.

    Wes was a man, though, and could take it. I'm not so sure about Jake Lloyd. [dailymail.co.uk]