Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday December 18 2016, @01:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the fact-following-fiction dept.

Wired has a recent article about author Octavia Butler and how her work presaged the "Make America Great" again campaign.

Octavia Butler, who died in 2006, was the author of such visionary science fiction novels as Kindred, The Parable of the Sower, and Dawn. Gerry Canavan, who just published a book-length study of Butler, describes her as one of the greatest writers of her era.

"I think you'd put her up there with Philip K. Dick and Le Guin and Delany and these other people who really made an impact on the way that science fiction circulates," Canavan says in Episode 234 of the Geek's Guide to the Galaxy podcast. "Especially that mode of literary science fiction that's somewhere in the middle between genre fiction and prize-winning novels, she has to be top two, top three in that list."

Butler made headlines this year when fans noted that her 1998 novel The Parable of the Talents features a fascist politician who rises to power by promising to "make America great again." The comparisons to Donald Trump are obvious, but Canavan says the character was actually inspired by Ronald Reagan.

[...] Butler had a singularly dark imagination, and often had to do multiple rewrites in order to tell her stories in a way that readers would find palatable. But Canavan says that in the current political climate, Butler's dim view of humanity is starting to seem ever more relevant.

"She often thought about how easy it would be for everything to just kind of go back to the way it was," he says. "That the things that seemed like they were permanent progress were really just a kind of epiphenomenon of the wealth of the United States in the latter half of the 20th century, and that when that fell apart, all the bad days would come back again."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Gaaark on Sunday December 18 2016, @05:42PM

    by Gaaark (41) on Sunday December 18 2016, @05:42PM (#442726) Journal

    The only time i haven't voted was one time i didn't vote early and was sick as a dog on election day: i thought "well, whoever is elected can't be that bad".

    Then the NDP got elected into Ontario (Canada).

    I'd go to work everyday and have maybe a 6 pack of beer for the weekend.
    The welfare people across the road got case after case of beer and drank all weekend because the NDP raised what they got for 'allowance'.
    My taxes went up to support THEIR drinking.

    The next election, i voted and Mike Harris got elected because he made good promises: AND HE KEPT THEM!
    The people across the street were made to work for their welfare (workfare): the drinking slowed considerably because they actually had to get up and go to work!!!! (IMAGINE THAT... HAVING TO WORK FOR YOUR CHEQUE!!!)

    But because he did what he promised, people voted him out. Now the politicians in Canada (and it seems in the U.S. too) have learned "promise EVERYTHING, do NOTHING!!".

    I have always voted since then, usually at the early polling.
    Mostly i vote for parties other than the big 2/3, to try to institute change, but never, ever will i miss another chance to vote...

    Trying hard to reform the electoral system (which the newly elected Liberals promised to do, but are now pulling back from): trying to push every vote ACTUALLY mattering.

    I miss Preston Manning: the last politician i actually trusted.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday December 18 2016, @06:39PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday December 18 2016, @06:39PM (#442741) Journal

    Never say never, my friend. I was sick for this election day, but I did make it. Had the election been about three days later, I would have missed it when they hauled my butt to the hospital. Close call on that one.

    But, like you, I don't intend to miss an election for any reason less than a genuine emergency.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 18 2016, @09:38PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 18 2016, @09:38PM (#442822)

      Do you support early voting? If you had genuinely missed it due to your hospital visit, would you support early voting?

      • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday December 19 2016, @12:38AM

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday December 19 2016, @12:38AM (#442875) Journal

        Support it? Well, yeah, I do. But, I've never bothered to sign up for it, or check into it, or whatever. Maybe I should . . . .

        • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Wednesday December 21 2016, @02:15AM

          by Gaaark (41) on Wednesday December 21 2016, @02:15AM (#444173) Journal

          Early polling is great: most of the time, I've walked in, voted and left. No waiting.

          --
          --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by turgid on Sunday December 18 2016, @09:13PM

    by turgid (4318) Subscriber Badge on Sunday December 18 2016, @09:13PM (#442810) Journal

    The people across the street were made to work for their welfare (workfare):

    That's all very tough sounding and stiff-upper-lip, and that's great if the people in receipt of the welfare are able to work. It's also great if the people on welfare aren't being exploited as a source of cheap labour for wealthy companies that would rather not pay a fair wage.

    It's not great when the people are too ill, old, young or disabled to actually work for a living.

    But you knew that anyway, and you were just angry because of that one family that you saw on your street, right?

    • (Score: 3, Touché) by Gaaark on Monday December 19 2016, @03:45AM

      by Gaaark (41) on Monday December 19 2016, @03:45AM (#442939) Journal

      Wow

      Get a real life.
        That's the best you got?
      Yeah, I'm all for fucking with everyone. SHEEIT.

      If you CAN go to the beer store, lift a few two-fours of beer and spend your weekend drinking and ignoring your house, property AND kids, then yes.... Yes you can fecking well work for that fecking cheque.

      If there is a problem, then no. But no, I don't believe you should get a free run because your on welfare AND able to work.

      I knew a guy in Toronto who worked at a group home for multi-handicapped kids: he had nothing below his elbows and nothing below the knees because he was a phlobidimide baby.
      He had no hands, no legs and found prosthetic arm and hands to be awful. He did use prosthetic legs. And he worked alongside us in the group home.

      And he worked hard for his paycheck as a salary worker full-time, not workfare.

      There is a lot of work most people could do: we're going to be training our son to do work of some kind, so that he isn't just sitting around bored, for one thing.

      Get off it: there are a lot of people who were raised on welfare by parents raised on welfare and are raising their own kids to be on welfare.....

      If you can work, get out and work. If you legitimately can't, or are elderly (especially if you worked your life through), then no.

      But you knew that anyway, and you were just angry because of that one family that you saw on your street, right?

      Don't be an ass.

      --
      --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---