Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by on Sunday December 18 2016, @11:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the slow-news-day dept.

Just how this came to be is a narrative that remains murky and – ironically – far from fixed. It's a story that offers insights into the sometimes unexpected pace of technological change, and one that's peopled by unsung inventors and obsessive tinkerers. It taps a fervent debate that most of us are oblivious to.

The earliest typewriters were cumbersome, moody machines but there was nevertheless an order to their keys that any English-speaking user could readily glean: they were arranged alphabetically. So why change this logical layout? Legend has it that Qwerty – known for the jabberwocky-style word formed by the first six letters of its top row – was dreamt up with the express purpose of slowing typists down. One character even lectures another about it in a Paulo Coelho novel.

In fact, the Qwerty layout was concocted to prevent keys from jamming – or at least, that's what most experts have tended to believe. The letters on a typewriter are affixed to metal arms, which are activated by the keys; on early models, if a lever was activated before its neighbour had fully come back down to rest, they would jam, forcing the typist to stop. Enter Christopher Sholes. Born in small-town Pennsylvania in 1819, Sholes was many things, including newspaper editor and Wisconsin state senator. He was also one of a team of inventors credited with building the first commercially viable typewriter. Having already tried to build machines for typesetting and printing numbers, Sholes' adventures in type began in 1867, when he read an article in Scientific American describing the Pterotype, a prototype typewriter invented by one John Pratt. The article sounded the death knoll for that "laborious and unsatisfactory" instrument, the pen, soon to be set down in favour of "playing on the literary piano".


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Flamebait) by SomeGuy on Monday December 19 2016, @01:45AM

    by SomeGuy (5632) on Monday December 19 2016, @01:45AM (#442897)

    I'm guessing it is because Microsoft has not yet mined all those telemetry metrics they are collecting, thrown the numbers to the team that developed the MS-Office ribbon and Metro, come out with a new keyboard "standard" that is completely useless garbage, and then cry more about how phones are killing PCs.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Flamebait=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 20 2016, @12:55PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 20 2016, @12:55PM (#443735)

    Not flamebait. This is exactly how Microsoft works. If they could justify thinking they could profit off of a new keyboard layout they WOULD introduce it and nag their users to switch and eventually force the switch, REGARDLESS of what the users or sysadmins feel.

    • (Score: 1) by toddestan on Friday December 23 2016, @02:38AM

      by toddestan (4982) on Friday December 23 2016, @02:38AM (#444896)

      You mean like how they introduced the Windows key 21 years ago with Windows 95? And that other useless key which is basically the right mouse button but on the keyboard?