Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Sunday December 18 2016, @11:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the slow-news-day dept.

Just how this came to be is a narrative that remains murky and – ironically – far from fixed. It's a story that offers insights into the sometimes unexpected pace of technological change, and one that's peopled by unsung inventors and obsessive tinkerers. It taps a fervent debate that most of us are oblivious to.

The earliest typewriters were cumbersome, moody machines but there was nevertheless an order to their keys that any English-speaking user could readily glean: they were arranged alphabetically. So why change this logical layout? Legend has it that Qwerty – known for the jabberwocky-style word formed by the first six letters of its top row – was dreamt up with the express purpose of slowing typists down. One character even lectures another about it in a Paulo Coelho novel.

In fact, the Qwerty layout was concocted to prevent keys from jamming – or at least, that's what most experts have tended to believe. The letters on a typewriter are affixed to metal arms, which are activated by the keys; on early models, if a lever was activated before its neighbour had fully come back down to rest, they would jam, forcing the typist to stop. Enter Christopher Sholes. Born in small-town Pennsylvania in 1819, Sholes was many things, including newspaper editor and Wisconsin state senator. He was also one of a team of inventors credited with building the first commercially viable typewriter. Having already tried to build machines for typesetting and printing numbers, Sholes' adventures in type began in 1867, when he read an article in Scientific American describing the Pterotype, a prototype typewriter invented by one John Pratt. The article sounded the death knoll for that "laborious and unsatisfactory" instrument, the pen, soon to be set down in favour of "playing on the literary piano".


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Frosty Piss on Monday December 19 2016, @04:33AM

    by Frosty Piss (4971) on Monday December 19 2016, @04:33AM (#442951)

    Since I never learned to type - I am the master of the "hunt and peck" - I don't care where the keys are.

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Webweasel on Monday December 19 2016, @09:05AM

    by Webweasel (567) on Monday December 19 2016, @09:05AM (#443031) Homepage Journal

    Get a Das Keyboard with blank keys.

    I was hunt and peck until I got one, took me about 2 days of using it at work and I could touchtype.

    The secret is: Looking at the keyboard won't help, your fingers have to learn. You will be surprised how quickly they do.

    Down side? Passwords are now in finger memory. I don't know my password, but my hands do. Its rather odd.

    --
    Priyom.org Number stations, Russian Military radio. "You are a bad, bad man. Do you have any other virtues?"-Runaway1956
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 19 2016, @01:37PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 19 2016, @01:37PM (#443112)

      Down side? Passwords are now in finger memory. I don't know my password, but my hands do. Its rather odd.

      It is odd. I have the same issue. At times I have had to resort to opening a text editor to type out my password to easily see what it was. On my most commonly used accounts, I have completely random passwords because once I use them enough, I remember them. But, sometimes at some point they move into finger memory and I have a real problem trying to remember what they are without typing them. The downside to this is that if the account ever get seldom used, I run the real risk of forgetting the password.