Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday December 19 2016, @02:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the shouting-is-not-the-answer dept.

The Federal Communications Commission last week approved one of the most important advances in communications technology for deaf and hard of hearing people in decades, in one of the agency's final acts under the leadership of outgoing FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler.

In a move that's being hailed by accessibility advocates and leaders in the deaf and hard of hearing community as a historic step forward, the five-member FCC unanimously adopted rules to facilitate the transition from outdated, analog teletype (TTY) devices to a new, internet-based, real-time text messaging standard (RTT) compatible with the latest smart phones.

As a result of the FCC's action, the nation's wireless carriers and device manufacturers will be required to support RTT functionality, which allows real-time text messaging—without the need to hit "send"—in which the recipient can instantly see letters, characters and words as they are being typed.

[...] This innovation will facilitate more natural, conversation-friendly communication for deaf and hard of hearing people—without the need for separate, specialized hardware. It will also allow 911 operators to receive incomplete messages during an emergency, potentially saving lives. RTT technology is expected to be inter-operable across wireless networks and devices, creating the potential for unprecedented ease of communication between deaf and hearing people.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Monday December 19 2016, @07:52PM

    by LoRdTAW (3755) on Monday December 19 2016, @07:52PM (#443286) Journal

    Who is "we"? I don't know about you, but I put on a safety belt of my own accord, etc., and cars do indeed market their competitive edge in safety tests, etc. There is a strong market for such things, not because the government mandates it, but rather because people do not want to die.

    This article disagrees with your assumption: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_safety [wikipedia.org]

    Car makers were interested in safety but there was no coherent demand or push. Through the results of studies, the government took interest in making cars safer and making it mandatory. If buyers drove the market for safer vehicles, then we wouldn't need seat belt laws.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2