Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday December 19 2016, @07:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the boring-doesn't-have-to-be-boring dept.

http://arstechnica.com/cars/2016/12/elon-musk-hates-sitting-in-traffic-so-now-hes-going-to-build-tunnels/

Brunel had his ships. Trump had his walls. And now Musk wants to make... tunnels, tunnels under cities to reduce traffic congestion and make the world a better, cleaner, less rage-filled place.

Over the weekend, probably while sitting in traffic behind the wheel of an autonomous Tesla, Musk tweeted: "Traffic is driving me nuts. Am going to build a tunnel boring machine and just start digging." An hour later, probably while still sitting in traffic, giving him plenty of time to think of a witty pun, he declared: "It shall be called 'The Boring Company.' Boring, it's what we do."

And finally, an hour after that, just in case any of us were foolish enough to think the billionaire multi-CEO was joking, Musk said, "I am actually going to do this." He also changed his Twitter bio to include "Tunnels."

So, unless Musk was suffering from a prolonged bout of entrepreneurial road rage, we now know roughly how long it takes a pedigree industrialist to pick a new disruptible domain: two hours, give or take.

Tunnels are indeed a pretty good solution for traffic congestion, though they take a long time to build, and the construction usually causes a huge amount of disruption above ground—especially if those tunnels are being built in a metropolitan area, which is where you'll find most of the world's congestion.

Depending on the setting, it can be very difficult and expensive to build tunnels as well. Cut-and-cover—where you dig up an existing road, build a tunnel, and put the road back—is the only "cheap" tunnel building method, but it's so incredibly disruptive that most tunnels nowadays are built at deeper depths by automated tunnel boring machines (TBMs). Cost-wise, you're looking at about £1 billion per mile for TBMs: London's Crossrail, with 13 miles of new tunnel, will cost around £15 billion; Manhattan's second avenue subway line, with 8.5 miles of new tunnel, will cost about $17 billion. The costs are much lower if you just want to bore through a mountain—the just-completed 35-mile Gotthard Base Tunnel through the Alps in Switzerland cost a mere £10 billion (and took 17 years to build!)—but I doubt Musk has those kinds of tunnels in mind.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JNCF on Monday December 19 2016, @07:28PM

    by JNCF (4317) on Monday December 19 2016, @07:28PM (#443273) Journal

    Totally safe for work [youtube.com] and worth the thirteen minutes of your life.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by dyingtolive on Monday December 19 2016, @07:54PM

    by dyingtolive (952) on Monday December 19 2016, @07:54PM (#443289)

    That thing is just silly in an awesome way.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday December 19 2016, @08:14PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday December 19 2016, @08:14PM (#443301)

    Deep.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by mhajicek on Tuesday December 20 2016, @01:58AM

    by mhajicek (51) on Tuesday December 20 2016, @01:58AM (#443492)

    Perfecting cheap and reliable tunneling machines would help the colonization of other worlds. Tunnels would help to provide shelter from the elements and radiation without much expenditure of resources.

    --
    The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek