Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday December 21 2016, @07:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the stringing-you-along dept.

Stradivarius violins are renowned for their supposedly superior sound when compared to other instruments. This has resulted in numerous studies hunting for a scientific reason for why Strads sound so good. A number of these studies have focused on the chemical composition of the wood in violins made in Cremona by Antonio Stradivari in the 17th and 18th centuries. Others have considered the violins made by Stradivari's contemporary, Joseph Guarneri del Gesu, whose violins are widely considered to be just as good.

Research often looks at how the materials used in the construction of the instrument define its superior quality. For example, one study argued that a "little ice age" which affected Europe from 1645 to 1715, was responsible for the slow-growth wood used in the construction of the violins that gives them a particular quality. This type of wood would have been available to all violin makers in Europe so other work has looked at the particular varnish applied to Strads. But the most recent study on this showed that Stradivari finishes were also commonly used by other craftsmen and artists and were not particularly special.

Now a team of scientists from National Taiwan University have tried to uncover the secret of Stradivarius violins by analysing the chemistry of the wood they're made from. The researchers found that the aged and treated maple wood had very different properties from that used to make modern instruments. But is there really a secret to be found in the Stradivarius?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Wednesday December 21 2016, @09:06PM

    by butthurt (6141) on Wednesday December 21 2016, @09:06PM (#444476) Journal

    > [...] PBS is they are all about public support and the virtues of the leftie commons [...]

    The PBS certainly are a beneficiary of the commons that is the publicly owned airwaves. I'm not aware that, beyond wanting to continue broadcasting, they advocate for the idea of a commons. Can you provide an example of that?

    Are you saying that in America, the notion of the commons is only valued by the left, and that the PBS only represent a leftist viewpoint?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2