Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Thursday December 22 2016, @09:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the Mirai-IoT-Botnet dept.

Canonical, maker of Ubuntu Linux and its Internet of Things variant, has discovered the obvious – that people cannot be trusted to secure their connected devices.

Thibaut Rouffineau, evangelist for Ubuntu Core and the Internet of Things, admitted late last week that developers and IoT device makers know people seldom update the firmware of connected devices. But, he argues, they probably don't realize how bad the security situation has become.

The distro maker says it surveyed 2,000 folks about how they dealt with connected devices. It found that less than a third of respondents (31 per cent) installed updates as soon as they were available. Some 40 per cent never knowingly updated their devices.

"In other words, consumers are leaving their devices open to exploits and hacks, from DDoS attacks to invasions of personal privacy or theft of personal data," said Rouffineau.

Why such disinterest? According to Rouffineau, almost two thirds of respondents felt that keeping software updated – their security – was not their responsibility.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Zinho on Thursday December 22 2016, @01:14PM

    by Zinho (759) on Thursday December 22 2016, @01:14PM (#444700)

    Worse is that you have no idea if an update is patching a vulnerability or opening up some new spy/tracking functions, or even just bricking your device ("oops, dodgy code, please return to supplier for replacement, sorry you lost your recordings"; who am I kidding, they are never sorry)

    If only this were a hypothetical risk, as opposed to something that actually happened, recently, with Philips Hue systems specifically. [duckduckgo.com] Bonus: it was intentional, not a bug. No, they weren't sorry. [meethue.com]

    --
    "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=1, Underrated=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Thursday December 22 2016, @10:58PM

    by butthurt (6141) on Thursday December 22 2016, @10:58PM (#444866) Journal

    This is linked from the top of the page you linked (emphasis mine):

    We would like to let you know that we’ve rolled out worldwide software that replaces the previous 1.11 software update of Philips Hue. This means that lights from other brands will work as before with the Philips Hue system using interoperability provided by ZigBee Light Link.

    -- https://developers.meethue.com/documentation/3rd-parties-and-homekithttps://developers.meethue.com/documentation/3rd-parties-and-homekit [meethue.com]

    It goes on to say (if I understand correctly) that the compatibility with Apple HomeKit will remain disabled. At least, though, they did reverse part of what they'd done (assuming they're not lying).

    • (Score: 2) by Zinho on Friday December 23 2016, @03:02PM

      by Zinho (759) on Friday December 23 2016, @03:02PM (#445032)

      Yes, they did roll back the change that bricked 3rd party lights.

      No, Philips doesn't think that was the best solution. They are convinced that blocking 3rd party/non-"friends of Hue" products is the best solution and their corporate non-apology is very clear about that. They rolled it back after a wave of sharp, vocal criticism from first adopters with lots of social media influence called them out. Philips is on my "do not buy" list, right next to Sony, due to this shenanigan. Advertizing yourself as being an implementation of an open standard (ZigBee, in this case) and then transforming into an incompatible walled garden with no warning via software update is a Wheaton's Law violation.

      That said, I don't really fault Philips for excluding the Apple products. Apple is also attempting to build a walled-garden lighting ecosystem, intentionally incompatible with off-the-shelf components. And they'll get away with it, because they're Apple. Philips has no responsibility, neither to their own customers nor to Apple's, to interoperate with a system that isn't even trying to implement the same standard.

      --
      "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin