Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday December 25 2016, @05:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the all-talk-no-action dept.

Would you have sex with a robot? Would you marry one? Would a robot have the right to say no to such a union?

These were just a few of the questions being asked at the second Love and Sex with Robots conference hastily rearranged at Goldsmiths University in London after the government in Malaysia - the original location - banned it. It has proved controversial, not only to countries with conservative views.

There were no representatives from the sex industry in attendance and no sex robots on display, leading some to question the point of the event.

RealDolls, a Californian-based firm that makes lifelike sex toys, claimed that it would release an artificial intelligence-enhanced sex doll next year. The launch, if it happens, will be vindication for Dr David Levy, who has long predicted the era of intelligent human-looking robots.

A story for those hoping to find a Fully Integrated Security Technotronic Officer under the tree Christmas morning...


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 25 2016, @06:25PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 25 2016, @06:25PM (#445835)

    but the robot said she just wanted to be friends.

  • (Score: 4, Funny) by davester666 on Sunday December 25 2016, @06:54PM

    by davester666 (155) on Sunday December 25 2016, @06:54PM (#445844)

    she should have worn something different if she just wanted to be friends.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 27 2016, @09:24PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 27 2016, @09:24PM (#446466)

    Oh, Fry, I love you more than the moon, the stars, the . . . POETIC IMAGE #36 NOT FOUND.