Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday December 25 2016, @09:36PM   Printer-friendly
from the do-you-speak-math? dept.

When one of my daughters was in high school, a student in her math class stood up in disgust and exclaimed "Why do we have to learn math for 12 years when we are never going to use any of it?" You might think that as a mathematics educator I would find this statement upsetting. Instead, the student's question got me thinking about the fact that she saw no connection between the mathematics and her future, even though her curriculum was full of story problems that at the time I would have called "real-world problems." Every mathematician has probably encountered an "I'm not fond of math" confession. Choose any subject and you can probably find someone who dislikes it or does not care to practice it. But when I have talked with strangers about my experience teaching English and shop and history and physical education, I rarely (if ever) have encountered a negative response. Because math can be a pathway to many careers, the problem seems important to address.

Mathematics in its purest forms has incredible power and beauty. New mathematics is key to innovations in most science, technology, engineering and mathematics-related (STEM) fields. Often at the time new mathematics is invented, we don't yet know how it will relate to other ideas and have impact in the world. Mathematical modelers use ideas from mathematics (as well as computational algorithms and techniques from statistics and operations research) to tackle big, messy, real problems. The models often optimize a limited resource such as time, money, energy, distance, safety, or health. But rather than finding a perfect answer, the solutions are "good enough" for the real-life requirements. These problems can be motivating for mathematics students, who can relate to mathematics that solves problems that are important to them.

To solve modeling problems, mathematicians make assumptions, choose a mathematical approach, get a solution, assess the solution for usefulness and accuracy, and then rework and adjust the model as needed until it provides an accurate and predictive enough understanding of the situation. Communicating the model and its implications in a clear, compelling way can be as critical to a model's success as the solution itself. Even very young students can engage in mathematical modeling. For example, you could ask students of any age how to decide which food to choose at the cafeteria and then mathematize that decision-making process by choosing what characteristics of the food are important and then rating the foods in the cafeteria by those standards. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) is providing leadership in communicating to teachers, students, and parents what mathematical modeling looks like in K–12 levels. The 2015 Focus issue of NCTM's Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School will be about mathematical modeling and the 2016 Annual Perspectives in Mathematics Education will also focus on the topic.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Monday December 26 2016, @01:40AM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Monday December 26 2016, @01:40AM (#445920) Homepage

    Just what we need, for math to be politicized so that people who don't think they need it will be even more turned off by it.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 26 2016, @02:28AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 26 2016, @02:28AM (#445933)
    The last time science was heavily politicised was in the days of Trofim Lysenko [wikipedia.org]. He had his own theories of biology that were in accord with Soviet ideology, and the fact that they didn’t reflect reality resulted in disastrous agricultural policy for the Soviet Union that caused famines which killed millions. What will this next politicisation of science yield, I wonder?
  • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 26 2016, @03:15AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 26 2016, @03:15AM (#445949)

    Except here, the definition of "politicized" is "I don't agree with the results, therefore it can't be true".

    • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Monday December 26 2016, @03:42AM

      by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Monday December 26 2016, @03:42AM (#445954) Homepage

      Math is like any other language, you can frame your argument and set everything up to make your point, but there are always a few assholes out there who not only know that language but can use it to argue against you.

      The barrier to argument is a bit more high, but the idea remains the same.

      The mathematical argument might be more effective to the layman if it were titled "a survey of statistical data with regard to geophysics and climatology" rather than "Man causes climate change because Leftist Faggots Told me so."

      Knowing math doesn't make people smart anyway - as a technician who's worked with more than his share of autistic retard engineers, I speak with authority in these matters. That a retard like me can see a thinly-veiled mathematical political rant is a testament to that.