Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Monday December 26 2016, @01:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the CRISPR-doesn't-mean-fry-it-longer dept.

UC Berkeley scientists have discovered simple CRISPR systems similar to CRISPR-Cas9—a gene-editing tool that has revolutionized biology—in previously unexplored bacteria that have eluded efforts to grow them in the laboratory.

The new systems are highly compact, befitting their presence in some of the smallest life forms on the planet. If these systems can be re-engineered like CRISPR-Cas9, their small size could make them easier to insert into cells to edit DNA, expanding the gene-editing toolbox available to researchers and physicians.

"These are particularly interesting because the key protein in these CRISPR systems is approximately the same as Cas9, but is not Cas9. It is part of a minimal system that has obvious potential for gene editing," said Jill Banfield, a UC Berkeley professor of earth and planetary sciences and of environmental science, policy and management.

In CRISPR-Cas systems, the Cas protein is the scissors. When targeted to a specific sequence of DNA, the Cas protein binds and severs double-stranded DNA. The new discovery nearly doubles the number of simple and compact CRISPR-Cas systems potentially useful as laboratory and biomedical tools.

"The important thing here is that we found some of these CRISPR systems in a major branch of the bacterial tree, opening the door to a whole new world of microbes that are not cultured in the lab, so we don't really know what they are and what their habits are," said co-author Jennifer Doudna, a UC Berkeley professor of molecular and cell biology and of chemistry and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator. Both Doudna and Banfield are faculty scientists at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

David Burstein et al. New CRISPR–Cas systems from uncultivated microbes, Nature (2016). DOI: 10.1038/nature21059


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by sbgen on Tuesday December 27 2016, @02:31AM

    by sbgen (1302) on Tuesday December 27 2016, @02:31AM (#446225)

    I have not yet read the actual research paper but your question has one answer in the link below, besides others. First the link: http://phys.org/news/2016-12-anti-crispr-gene.html#nRlv [phys.org].
    The error rate from using CRISPR-Cas9 system is very low but it is not yet below the background mutation inherent to our cells. Efforts are on to achieve this low level of error rate which is likely to be acceptable for a variety of sensitive uses. A naturally occurring off-switch system would be a great help. The research article the linked talks about just that.
    Have a good day,

    --
    Warning: Not a computer expert, but got to use it. Yes, my kind does exist.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2