Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by on Friday December 30 2016, @09:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the will-provide-tattoos-for-right-applicant dept.

Seems someone got the whole thing seriously wrong, but evidently there was a casting call for actors for a Cadillac commercial that was looking for "alt-right" or "neo-nazi" types.

Cadillac caused a stir this week when a casting service put out a request on behalf of the American luxury brand looking to fill the role of an "alt-right (neo-Nazi)" in a new commercial. Cadillac denied it had ever authorized the notice and condemned it, while the casting company took responsibility, saying that it had been issued by mistake. Regardless of who did what, the idea had to have been hatched somewhere and by someone, which reveals something far more troubling than a mere streak of poor taste and even poorer judgement in corporate America: the marketability and mainstreaming of an alt-right population, or those "identified variously with anti-globalist and anti-immigrant stances, cartoon frogs, white nationalists, pick-up artists, anti-Semites, and a rising tide of right-wing populism," as Tablet contributor Jacob Siegel wrote in a profile of Paul Gottfried, the alt-right's "godfather."

Hmm, maybe now that the "alt-right" has become just another marketing demographic, we do not have to worry about them taking over the country? I mean, who buys Cadillacs as a status symbol anymore? Not like they are your father's Oldsmobile. Except that, really, it was your father's Olds. So that brand no longer exists. Are we at the point where we can say, "Brietbart: it's not your grandpa's fascism!"? Except, really, maybe it is?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Whoever on Friday December 30 2016, @10:39AM

    by Whoever (4524) on Friday December 30 2016, @10:39AM (#447363) Journal

    The alt-right are not neo-Nazis.

    No, the alt-right are White Supremacists.

    The whole purpose of the invention of the term 'alt-right' is to disguise their real motives.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Troll=1, Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Disagree=1, Total=6
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @11:47AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @11:47AM (#447371)

    No, the alt-right are White Supremacists.

    Nope, 1488'ers are white supremacists. The NRx movement are rationalists and Moldbug was Jewish.

  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @07:07PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @07:07PM (#447559)

    > No, the alt-right are White Supremacists.

    With lots of nationalism and socialism (for the 'deserving' aka whites) thrown in to the mix.

    But if neo-nazi is too narrow, then lets just stick to alt-white.