Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Friday December 30 2016, @09:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the will-provide-tattoos-for-right-applicant dept.

Seems someone got the whole thing seriously wrong, but evidently there was a casting call for actors for a Cadillac commercial that was looking for "alt-right" or "neo-nazi" types.

Cadillac caused a stir this week when a casting service put out a request on behalf of the American luxury brand looking to fill the role of an "alt-right (neo-Nazi)" in a new commercial. Cadillac denied it had ever authorized the notice and condemned it, while the casting company took responsibility, saying that it had been issued by mistake. Regardless of who did what, the idea had to have been hatched somewhere and by someone, which reveals something far more troubling than a mere streak of poor taste and even poorer judgement in corporate America: the marketability and mainstreaming of an alt-right population, or those "identified variously with anti-globalist and anti-immigrant stances, cartoon frogs, white nationalists, pick-up artists, anti-Semites, and a rising tide of right-wing populism," as Tablet contributor Jacob Siegel wrote in a profile of Paul Gottfried, the alt-right's "godfather."

Hmm, maybe now that the "alt-right" has become just another marketing demographic, we do not have to worry about them taking over the country? I mean, who buys Cadillacs as a status symbol anymore? Not like they are your father's Oldsmobile. Except that, really, it was your father's Olds. So that brand no longer exists. Are we at the point where we can say, "Brietbart: it's not your grandpa's fascism!"? Except, really, maybe it is?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @11:17AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @11:17AM (#447366)

    This shows the world wants to return to sanity. At least the beginnings are here. The insanity promoted by the enemies of human-kind is starting to fall.

    Regardless of who did what, the idea had to have been hatched somewhere and by someone, which reveals something far more troubling than a mere streak of poor taste and even poorer judgement in corporate America ...

    I don't know where to begin. The above statement is so wrong and evil and is only there to brainwash people into thinking in terms of "as bad as person x" without making any case of why person x is bad or why the author thinks that way. It works by suggestion. Whoever "hatched" the above story needs to be hung from a tree. Soon.

    I find it far more troubling that globalists, immigrant-lovers, Khazars etc are being called "people". They all need to go away and drop dead. Filthy scum.

    If blacks in Africa wanted a black-only state and refused to mix with other races, would that be racism?

    If chinese in China wanted a chinese-only state and refused to mix with other races, would that be racism?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Troll=2, Insightful=1, Interesting=2, Total=5
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Bethany.Saint on Friday December 30 2016, @11:55AM

    by Bethany.Saint (5900) on Friday December 30 2016, @11:55AM (#447372)

    "If blacks in Africa, If Chinese in China ..."
    Yes, of course it would be racism. It is racism.

    But here's the thing. You imply that Americans in America want a white only state. Fact is, most Americans do not want a white only state. The majority of Americans appreciate the diversity we get from other races. We realize it makes for a stronger country. Only a small but very loud and violent group want an all white America.

    Two steps forward then one step back. We've just started our step back. I have faith we can fix America after the Alt-Right drags towards third-world status.

    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by bradley13 on Friday December 30 2016, @12:13PM

      by bradley13 (3053) on Friday December 30 2016, @12:13PM (#447376) Homepage Journal

      I don't think most alt-righters are calling for a white-only state. I think there are two separate dynamics going on, which can be easily confused:

      - Support for a single culture (as opposed to multiculturalism). The strength of the US was that it once functioned as a "melting pot" where people surrendered their original culture and became Americans. A nation of immigrants. Today, people are encouraged to retain their original culture. Many in the alt-right see this as a problem.

      - Second, many whites in the US seem to feel that they are disadvantaged in a country where they are the nominal majority. They are accused of racism, told to "check their privilege", etc. - almost as if they are supposed to be ashamed of being white. Why is "black pride" laudable, but "white pride" is racist?

      Of course, there are genuine racists and white supremacists who use the alt-right for cover. However, they appear to be a minority. Most alt-righters are typical of the many people who supported Trump [umich.edu]. The real problem is the fact that the liberals and progressives cannot get their heads around why anyone would feel this way - a complete breakdown of communications, between two very different groups of people sharing the same country.

      --
      Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
      • (Score: 3, Informative) by Bethany.Saint on Friday December 30 2016, @01:26PM

        by Bethany.Saint (5900) on Friday December 30 2016, @01:26PM (#447396)

        Good points. Some spot on. So I'll only respond to a few.

        >>Today, people are encouraged to retain their original culture.
        This is true. Taken to extreme, I see this a being a problem as well. I support efforts to "melt" immigrants. I believe many in the middle left do too.

        >>Second, many whites in the US seem to feel that they are disadvantaged in a country where they are the nominal majority.
        They do, but they are not disadvantaged because of advances by minorities. This narrative of minorities has been a mainstay of Republicans for years now. Unfortunately it's become ingrained as fact in the Alt-Right.

        >>They are accused of racism, told to "check their privilege", etc. - almost as if they are supposed to be ashamed of being white.
        They are not. This is in their own minds and not in reality. This, in particular, seems to be a blind spot among the Alt-Right.

        >>Why is "black pride" laudable, but "white pride" is racist?
        It is not. But we don't see many examples of "white pride." What we see is attacking blacks (and most minorities) as the cause of current conditions rather than pride for white achievements in and of themselves. (For example, waving the "Confederate flag" is not white pride. It's out and out racism.)

        • (Score: 2, Troll) by khallow on Friday December 30 2016, @02:18PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday December 30 2016, @02:18PM (#447423) Journal
          There's an awful lot of "We've always been at war with Eastasia" in that post.

          >>They are accused of racism, told to "check their privilege", etc. - almost as if they are supposed to be ashamed of being white.

          They are not. This is in their own minds and not in reality. This, in particular, seems to be a blind spot among the Alt-Right.

          And a whole bunch of universities to name a prominent example you missed.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @02:28PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @02:28PM (#447428)

          it's easy to avoid problems by redefining them as something else which is fine

      • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Phoenix666 on Friday December 30 2016, @02:08PM

        by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday December 30 2016, @02:08PM (#447415) Journal

        Support for a single culture (as opposed to multiculturalism). The strength of the US was that it once functioned as a "melting pot" where people surrendered their original culture and became Americans. A nation of immigrants. Today, people are encouraged to retain their original culture. Many in the alt-right see this as a problem.

        That's not what "melting pot" means. It means they become part of the mix, not that they disappear into the original solution and the original solution remains unchanged. But fine, let's run with your definition for a moment to see what that country you yearn for would look like.

        Starting immediately, eat not a single taco, pizza, or bowl of spaghetti more. Hot dogs and hamburgers are also right out. No chow mein, no burritos. No Irish pubs, no bagels. No foreign cars, because those might sneakily insinuate foreign driving concepts into a pure America. No computers, because computers are not made in America any more and are clearly a vector for attack by the People's Republic of China. Just keep carving away all the "foreign" bits until you may eat unflavored oatmeal mush for breakfast and dress like a Quaker of yore. Disallow any outside influences whatsoever, hermetically seal the culture in a glass jar, and set it on the shelf of your altar of purity.

        The America you know is the result of multi-culturalism, and nothing but that. And if you know your history, you'd know that it has never been "pure" at any time. When the first Europeans arrived on these shores there were already hundreds if not thousands of distinct languages and cultures at play on the continent. Among the Europeans there were the Spanish, Dutch, French, and English. Even if you said no, no, nobody counts but the English you'd still not have any kind of purity because there were Scots, Welshmen, Irish, Quakers, Puritans, Anglicans, Catholics, and many other distinct groups among them. That you eat corn and potatoes and possibly smoke tobacco is directly because there was cultural mixing with the Indians. You use foreign words from that mix all the time, like "raccoon" or "Chicago" without thinking about it.

        So it's an impossible goal, what you're striving for. America has never been what you imagine, nor will it ever be. It's also quite likely you would not even want to live in the country that twinkles in your dreams.

        --
        Washington DC delenda est.
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @10:15PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @10:15PM (#447622)

          Starting immediately, eat not a single taco, pizza, or bowl of spaghetti more. Hot dogs and hamburgers are also right out. No chow mein, no burritos. No Irish pubs, no bagels. No foreign cars, because those might sneakily insinuate foreign driving concepts into a pure America. No computers, because computers are not made in America any more and are clearly a vector for attack by the People's Republic of China. Just keep carving away all the "foreign" bits until you may eat unflavored oatmeal mush for breakfast and dress like a Quaker of yore.

          So what you're saying is that I need to stop appropriating other cultures?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @09:09PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @09:09PM (#447602)

        > Most alt-righters are typical of the many people who supported Trump [umich.edu]

        Oh look! Brad is lying by omission to make his position seem like its some sort of super-majority.

        Here's that same graph [umich.edu] scaled by population and then colored by the percentage of the vote. Not really overwhelmingly red anymore is it?

        If there is one thing you can count on, its that brad has absolutely no problem using intellectual dishonesty to support his arguments. Its comforting in a way, because once you recognize the pattern you realize its a confession that not only is he wrong, but he knows he's wrong but instead of changing his mind to fit the facts, he'd prefer to lie instead. Which means nothing he says should be trusted.

        For the curious, here is the full article. [umich.edu]

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @12:13PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @12:13PM (#447377)

      most Americans do not want a white only state.

      True, they also don't want to live in a warzone [heyjackass.com]. The metropolitan areas with the highest percentage black community and highest crime rates have something else in common don't they?

      I have faith we can fix America after the Alt-Right drags towards third-world status.

      Which party do voters in high crime metropolitan areas vote for? Third world you say?

      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Bethany.Saint on Friday December 30 2016, @12:55PM

        by Bethany.Saint (5900) on Friday December 30 2016, @12:55PM (#447384)

        >> The metropolitan areas with the highest percentage black community and highest crime rates have something else in common don't they?

        Not sure what you're trying to say here? Is that that we've trapped the black community in a cycle of poverty and despair in increasingly dense areas leaving violence as a means of gangs trying to exert some control over their lives as they enter adulthood. Or are you saying blacks are inherently violent because {something}?

        Couldn't be the conditions cause the violence and not the other way around, could it?

        • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @01:12PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @01:12PM (#447391)

          Blacks are unable to control their violence. Just like jews cannot control destroying the world and murdering its people/animals/plants.

          Blacks are certainly better than jews. Blacks were hurt quite bad by the slave trade run by jews. They should get their revenge. A while ago, israel got angry at BLM when they compared their suffering to those of Palestinians.

          Conditions don't last forever. People get chances to fix themselves and their communities. When a community refuses to do that (over centuries), it tells you something.

          • (Score: 2, Touché) by Bethany.Saint on Friday December 30 2016, @01:43PM

            by Bethany.Saint (5900) on Friday December 30 2016, @01:43PM (#447404)

            >>Blacks are unable to control their violence.

            Is this genetics ... built into the chromosomes? Could be fix blacks by modifying their genetics? Using new CRISPR techniques could we take some of the calming white bits and target the bad violent black genomes?

            Maybe we can target the "money" genes in the Jews too? Or maybe we extract the Jews money genetics and put them in Whites? That way we can fix the white poverty problems too? (Did I go too far with this one?)

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @01:58PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @01:58PM (#447413)

              Easy with the absurdity, you will be labelled "racist" by those who are genuinely absurd.

              Is this genetics ... built into the chromosomes?

              Testosterone.

              Maybe we can target the "money" genes in the Jews too?

              It's not a "money" gene. [haaretz.com]

              Problem behaviours need discussing if they are to be addressed. Easier for some to stick their fingers in their ears or drown out the discussion by crying "racist".

              • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Friday December 30 2016, @05:57PM

                by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Friday December 30 2016, @05:57PM (#447513) Journal

                Leeeeet me guess, testosterone is inversely proportional to intelligence? You also think penis size is inversely correlated with IQ, riiiiiight?

                I love this. By this logic East Asians should be worshiped, as they tend to have a higher IQ than every single ethnic group on the planet except--you're gonna love this one!-ASHKENAZI JEWS! I'll wait here behind this handy-dandy blast shield while you process that one, prepared for the inevitable brain explosion :D

                --
                I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @02:35AM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @02:35AM (#447728)

                  Leeeeet me guess, testosterone is inversely proportional to intelligence? You also think penis size is inversely correlated with IQ, riiiiiight?

                  Errr... No! FWIW I have both a big dick and a high IQ. Bite me!

                  I love this. By this logic East Asians should be worshiped, as they tend to have a higher IQ than every single ethnic group on the planet except--you're gonna love this one!-ASHKENAZI JEWS! I'll wait here behind this handy-dandy blast shield while you process that one, prepared for the inevitable brain explosion :D

                  Ohh, you got me!!! Except for that fact that genetic predisposition towards mental illness has nothing to do with penis size or religion. I'd suggest you stay behind the blast shield and prepare for the truth hitting you like the stale fart it is. Anybody with a basic education knew the truth long ago,

                  • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Saturday December 31 2016, @05:56AM

                    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Saturday December 31 2016, @05:56AM (#447769) Journal

                    Well, my "dick" is blue and lives in the sock drawer and may or may not eat dust bunnies, for what that's worth =P Sure as hell chews through batteries though. And my IQ's about 145 if that chart correlating SAT/ACT/GRE scores to IQ means anything.

                    But what's your point? Where does "mental illness" enter a discussion of which ethnicities typically test high for IQ, which is the point under discussion here. You went completely off the rails here. And hey, as people constantly remind me, "Jew" is as much an ethnicity as a religion, riiiiii~ght? Oh, excuse me, i forgot your kind use the term "Khazar" for the Ashkenazim (as opposed to the Sephardim, who would probably make you shit your size 3XL adult diaper if one of them sat next to you on a plane).

                    You are a special kind of stupid.

                    --
                    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
            • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Friday December 30 2016, @08:48PM

              by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Friday December 30 2016, @08:48PM (#447593) Homepage Journal

              Please don't feed the trolls! It only makes them worse.

              --
              mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
        • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday December 30 2016, @01:23PM

          by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Friday December 30 2016, @01:23PM (#447395) Homepage Journal

          The something else they have in common is that they vote democrat. Do note how much it has done for them since this trend started. Life in blue cities has become nothing but poorer and more violent. Not one is better to be poor or black in than it was 50 years ago.

          --
          My rights don't end where your fear begins.
          • (Score: 3, Informative) by Bethany.Saint on Friday December 30 2016, @01:51PM

            by Bethany.Saint (5900) on Friday December 30 2016, @01:51PM (#447407)

            They vote democrat because it offers the best hope for their future. Even if that future doesn't materialize. They know that the Republican solution is to take away benefits and by force of extreme poverty they somehow magically get off their lazy but violent butts and make something of themselves. When has making poor people even poorer ever worked to make them richer?

            • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @02:10PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @02:10PM (#447417)

              They vote democrat because it offers the best hope for their future. Even if that future doesn't materialize.

              We have a winner! Victim cards are not accepted as currency anywhere except in leftist politics and the only reward for voting democrat is issuance of yet more victim cards. Thus, the cycle of poverty is enshrined.

              • (Score: 1) by Bethany.Saint on Friday December 30 2016, @02:19PM

                by Bethany.Saint (5900) on Friday December 30 2016, @02:19PM (#447425)

                It's not a victim card, it's a reality card. Are you seriously saying they should be racing towards a worse life rather than attempting to avoid it? Is Republican thinking something like a weird black hole where if you dive head first into poverty you somehow magically fall through poverty and come out in a land of milk an honey?

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @02:29PM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @02:29PM (#447430)

                  Are you seriously saying they should be racing towards a worse life rather than attempting to avoid it?

                  I'm with Admiral Ackbar on this one.

                  Is Republican thinking something like a weird black hole where if you dive head first into poverty you somehow magically fall through poverty and come out in a land of milk an honey?

                  I'm not a republican. An individual forced to go out and hustle a legal wage for themselves will easily be able to afford milk and honey, should that be what they desire.

                  • (Score: 1) by Bethany.Saint on Friday December 30 2016, @03:36PM

                    by Bethany.Saint (5900) on Friday December 30 2016, @03:36PM (#447456)

                    >> An individual forced to go out and hustle a legal wage for themselves will easily be able to afford milk and honey

                    That's the entire point. There are no jobs for most of these people. They can't hustle what there is none of. Do you really think people would choose to, for example, rob a store, rather than work a normal job? Do you really believe there are entire cities of people who choose to do nothing rather than work? Taking away the safety net will not magically "force" them to get jobs. It will just make their situation worse. Look back at history before welfare and see how many people were unemployed and the horrible conditions (much worse than today) in which the unemployed were living.

                    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @04:24PM

                      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @04:24PM (#447473)

                      That's the entire point. There are no jobs for most of these people. They can't hustle what there is none of.

                      This defeatist attitude is the problem. Are you seriously saying people have devolved to some primitive level that precludes the use of hand tools? Are they so ill served by the education system that they are unable to read and write? Do they not have access to a public library?

                      There are no jobs or wealth creation possibilities for anyone other than the opportunities they create for themselves.

            • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday December 30 2016, @02:15PM

              by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Friday December 30 2016, @02:15PM (#447421) Homepage Journal

              That's what they're told, yes. That's not, however, what republicans want. If you want the middle class to come back, you help out SMB creation and growth. Race is really immaterial if you create conditions that ease the path out of poverty instead of subsidizing it.

              --
              My rights don't end where your fear begins.
              • (Score: 2) by Whoever on Friday December 30 2016, @04:10PM

                by Whoever (4524) on Friday December 30 2016, @04:10PM (#447469) Journal

                That's what they're told, yes. That's not, however, what republicans want.

                That's a nice illustration of why people vote Republican. Their personal beliefs simply don't agree with what actual Republican politicians will implement and they are in denial about this.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @02:11PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @02:11PM (#447419)

            And flyover country states vote republican even though the party acts against their best interests. One big difference is that the senators in those blue states support government social programs and subsidies at least call them that. In the red states they have to use code words for subsidies and handouts so that they can pretend they are really some sort of magical small government incentive program or something. The populace states, particularly the coastal states, have subsidized and propped up the "breadbasket" for ever. If the democrats really wanted to turn those states blue, they'd give them exactly what they say they want and stop sending them more money then they send to Washington.

            • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday December 30 2016, @02:27PM

              by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Friday December 30 2016, @02:27PM (#447427) Homepage Journal

              You created the money transfer conditions, you don't get to bitch about them as well. Give us red states a chance to get out of poverty and we'll take it; destroy all paths to wealth and subsidize poverty and it'll only get worse.

              What you fundamentally do not get is when you throw money at something, you get more of it. This is the reason for basically every problem this nation has. Put money where you want something to be, not where it is.

              --
              My rights don't end where your fear begins.
              • (Score: 2) by Whoever on Friday December 30 2016, @04:12PM

                by Whoever (4524) on Friday December 30 2016, @04:12PM (#447471) Journal

                Wow, how about you take some responsibility for your own actions?

                So your argument is that Red States are poor because "Democrats"? Did it ever occur to you that the Red States are poor because of the policies implemented by the politicians you voted for?

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @10:53PM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @10:53PM (#447641)

                  Did it ever occur to you that the Red States are poor because of the policies implemented by the politicians you voted for?

                  "Kansas uber alles!!" All hail Brownback!

                • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday December 31 2016, @11:41AM

                  by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Saturday December 31 2016, @11:41AM (#447818) Homepage Journal

                  I think you need to reread. Kansas is poor because Kansas has no industry to speak of. You, however, are the ones who decided to subsidize their poverty. Stop bitching.

                  --
                  My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                  • (Score: 2) by Whoever on Saturday December 31 2016, @12:04PM

                    by Whoever (4524) on Saturday December 31 2016, @12:04PM (#447826) Journal

                    "Stop bitching"? You are the one bitching about how somehow the politicians that you elected are not responsible for the poor economy in your state.

                    GROW UP! Take some responsibility for your actions.

                    • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday December 31 2016, @12:19PM

                      by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Saturday December 31 2016, @12:19PM (#447829) Homepage Journal

                      Was I? I'm pretty sure I wasn't. There's no sense in complaining that water is wet or that politicians are full of shit. Perhaps you should go back and have another read.

                      --
                      My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                      • (Score: 2) by Whoever on Saturday December 31 2016, @03:36PM

                        by Whoever (4524) on Saturday December 31 2016, @03:36PM (#447864) Journal

                        I did go back and re-read and, yes, you are trying to place blame on politicians other than the ones you put into power. As, I said, grow the fuck up and take responsibility for your own voting record.

                        Quite simply, the reason Red States tend to be poor is the policies enacted by their own leaders. Policies that keep people uneducated and poor, while a few people become very rich.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @01:36PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @01:36PM (#447400)

          Not sure what you're trying to say here? Is that that we've trapped the black community in a cycle of poverty and despair in increasingly dense areas leaving violence as a means of gangs trying to exert some control over their lives as they enter adulthood. Or are you saying blacks are inherently violent because {something}?

          The former.

          Couldn't be the conditions cause the violence and not the other way around, could it?

          We already know the answer to this. Anti-social behaviour develops as a character trait. In it's most popular and somewhat crass form; "you can take the person out of the ghetto but you cannot take the ghetto out of the person". We don't need to rehash what has already been said hundreds of times. [soapboxie.com]

          The biggest start you can give your children in life is self-esteem. You do this by supporting them financially, emotionally and psychologically. Generations trapped in a cycle of state dependence has denied some even the most basic level of human dignity. Gangs are tribes; the aspiration and behaviour prevalent within democrat voting, poorer inner city communities is an exact match for the 3rd world.

    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @12:53PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @12:53PM (#447382)

      Racism is the answer to being attacked day and night and told to mix.

      The human mind cannot easily deal with the attacks and starts hating those unlike him, choosing to work with only his race... in other words discriminating (I wonder (((who))) invented that particular usage of that word) against other races (OMG!!!111! how wrong!). So the globalists call them racists, and that is a loaded term. Hating your kind and by extension yourself is not a good idea.

      Love yourself, love your country, love your people, don't make a habit of mixing, and as a result, hating others. Nationalism = Love.

      Yes, of course it would be racism. It is racism.

      Would You Date a Trans? [youtube.com]

      • (Score: 1) by kurenai.tsubasa on Friday December 30 2016, @06:04PM

        by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Friday December 30 2016, @06:04PM (#447517) Journal

        Oh hey, a fishing lure! *noms*

        I'm not somewhere I can watch a video right now, but I'm assuming that question is directed at guys as concerns trans women. If that's the case, I'm happy to report that the answer is mostly “yes.” Not always, but enough of the time. And plus, if you're just having fun without any intention of heading into the bedroom, then the guy doesn't even have to know IT'S A TRAP, does he?

      • (Score: 1) by kurenai.tsubasa on Friday December 30 2016, @11:45PM

        by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Friday December 30 2016, @11:45PM (#447653) Journal

        Ah, watched a bit of the video, but the format was annoying.

        Deleting a rant about infiltrator sheaths and woman suits, here's what I'm wondering, though, if the conversation isn't too stale. Ok, so I can be on board with nationalism. I can even somewhat jive with this idea that the Chinese should stay in China and the Nigerians should stay in Nigeria and the Mexicans should stay in Mexico, etc, but not completely. Ok, I think I know what that rhetoric is yearning for, and it's something else than the words themselves would indicate, but that's not much part of what I'm wondering. Maybe it is, though?

        Let me know if I'm following your train of thought or completely failing to engage what you're saying.

        Let me put forth the idea, and I'm hoping this is what we're both thinking, that this is a certain culture that is American Culture. In American Culture, we celebrate Christmas (winter ritual), Easter (spring ritual), Independence Day (summer ritual), and Thanksgiving (fall ritual), in addition to other seasonal rituals such as Veteran's Day, Labor Day, and Memorial Day. We also value the free market, invention, innovation, and individualism. We believe that our forefathers have blessed us with liberty, and we believe it is our sacred duty to keep that liberty. Am I still on the same wavelength?

        Now, keep in mind I don't know the presenter of that video from Eve. Is dating a trans woman like dating a Chinese or Nigerian or Mexican woman? Are you saying that somebody who is a trans woman cannot be of this American Culture?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @05:42PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @05:42PM (#447505)

      But here's the thing. You imply that Americans in America want a white only state. Fact is, most Americans do not want a white only state. The majority of Americans appreciate the diversity we get from other races. We realize it makes for a stronger country.

      Bullshit, the majority of Americans don't give a rat's ass about racial politics. Half of them probably couldn't tell you more than 5 of the election promises of their candidate of choice in the recent election.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @11:59AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @11:59AM (#447373)

    I find it far more troubling that globalists, immigrant-lovers, Khazars etc are being called "people". They all need to go away and drop dead. Filthy scum.

    Trollolol. Your Nazi disguise is unconvincing and this is not the first time this year I've read the words of a liberal calling for people to die. What is wrong with you?

    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @12:56PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @12:56PM (#447387)

      Ok, maybe not calling for people to die. But still a wall needs to be put between different peoples. Dogs and cats and chickens usually do not live together.

      And its true that liberals call for death to all Nationalists.

      • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Friday December 30 2016, @02:13PM

        by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday December 30 2016, @02:13PM (#447420) Journal

        Your words and assertions are laughable and tedious. America is not a country of walls or shtetls. You would more profitably spend your time spreading this nonsense on Stormfront.

        --
        Washington DC delenda est.
      • (Score: 1) by kurenai.tsubasa on Friday December 30 2016, @07:16PM

        by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Friday December 30 2016, @07:16PM (#447567) Journal

        Hahahaha! That's a good one. Been to a farm lately? You have to be engaging in satire at this point!

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Phoenix666 on Friday December 30 2016, @01:50PM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday December 30 2016, @01:50PM (#447406) Journal

    And here, folks, we have an actual nazi. This is what they look like and how they talk. There are boxes you can check. In his brief post he checked several. First, he called for lynching those calling out Cadillac for casting neo-nazis, presumably because it's perfectly normal and acceptable to cast neo-nazis in commercials. Second, he dehumanized everyone he disagrees with and wished them all dead. Third, he favors mono-ethnic states.

    That's why it's ill-advised, even dangerous, to throw around charges of fascism and nazism loosely, because they lose all their power to describe in situations like this when they are apt, and needed.

    It's not only ACs that talk like this. There are registered users who have openly called for forced labor and extermination of immigrants. (Those are two more boxes to check in classifying an actual nazi.) Those are not the intentions of free thinkers, enlightened men, or moral beings. They are the darkest of evil that always stalks us and invades the hearts of the unwary.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    • (Score: 1, Troll) by Serial_Priest on Friday December 30 2016, @02:52PM

      by Serial_Priest (2493) <{accusingangel} {at} {autistici.org}> on Friday December 30 2016, @02:52PM (#447442)

      Keep thinking that those who disagree with you are "the darkest of evil" or "insane" and 2020 will be an even easier win for us than 2016 was. Why hate those who dissent from your orthodoxies? Be a decent person for once in your life.

      • (Score: 3, Touché) by linuxrocks123 on Friday December 30 2016, @07:27PM

        by linuxrocks123 (2557) on Friday December 30 2016, @07:27PM (#447569) Journal

        You didn't win easily: you got lucky. Even with your luck, you only won because the votes of the people who voted for you counted more due to some anachronistic features of the system.

        Think on that: you rolled a 20, and you could still only just barely win because the system was rigged in your favor. Same thing happened in 2000. The last time your party won a presidential election for real with a non-incumbent candidate was 1988.

        Your support is literally dying off, and long-term demographics are against you big time. You're circling the drain; you're just at the far part of your orbit around it right now. Enjoy it while it lasts, because it won't last long.

        Just try not to start a nuclear war or something for the people who will have to clean up after you, plz k thx.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @02:43AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @02:43AM (#447729)

          What the fuck? Are you completely retarded? Was it not HRC that promised to annihilate Iran and start a war with Russia?

          Yes it was -- go back and check.

          Was it not HRC funded by the Saudi's who deny women their rights, slaughter civilians in the Yemen and fund ISIS?

          You're a complete and utter cunt eh?

    • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @05:12PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @05:12PM (#447493)

      You are doing the demonic work of the jews.

      "free thinkers, enlightened men, or moral beings"

      Lets see what you mean by those:

      1. Free thinkers who disown their own race and sleep with jews.

      2. Enlightened men who are still in the dark and are being slaughtered. Enlightened only as much as Big Brother wants them to know.

      3. Moral beings who like being told which morals to live by, by television personalities. Morals that involve killing other peoples.

      -
      A real, honorable, enlightened human has different definitions:

      1. Free thinking to see through the veil that is being put on their eyes. Able to think for themselves, clearly.

      2. Enlightened men who know the meaning of racial purity and have no hate for their race. Enlightened to respect other races and cultures (and not judge them) as long as they do the same.

      3. Moral beings who benefit society and not fuel wars and death and destruction.

      • (Score: 3, Touché) by Azuma Hazuki on Friday December 30 2016, @06:11PM

        by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Friday December 30 2016, @06:11PM (#447523) Journal

        Explain to us what "racial purity" means. Please. With as much science as you can muster. I've got a bag of popcorn the size of the Ritz and by Cthulhu it looks like I'm gonna need it all.

        --
        I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
        • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @07:01PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @07:01PM (#447552)

          If jews tell you (ask you nicely through many persuasion techniques) to do something, you can bet it has GOT to be bad for you.

          They divide and conquer. A pure race is hard to fool. A pure race has many super-powers of the mind (no kidding here) and that is a great advantage. But you wouldn't know that if you are mixed.

          Race mixing is genocide. Those who are not faithful to their race are traitors.

          Ex French president jew Nicolas Sarkozy wants racial inter-breeding by law: French Ex-President Sarkozy again tells French to mix races. [whitegenocideproject.com]

          Mixed people have no identity. They may look like people, eat, drink like people but are not. They are hollow beings who do not have life energy. Easy to conquer.

    • (Score: 2) by BK on Friday December 30 2016, @05:32PM

      by BK (4868) on Friday December 30 2016, @05:32PM (#447499)

      I just figured that it was EF posting as AC to slip under your radar and troll you. Actually, I still think that.

      --
      ...but you HAVE heard of me.