Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday December 30 2016, @03:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the optimism-is-wonderful dept.

A group of Mexican farmer leaders and academics believe that U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's pledge to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, will be a good opportunity to review areas of the treaty that are not favorable to the sector in Mexico.

Experts say that after 23 years of its implementation, NAFTA, signed by Mexico, the United States and Canada in the early 90s, has helped dismantle Mexico's agricultural production system through neoliberal policies that have left millions of poor farmers without state support and have increased the country's food dependency on aboard, La Jornada reported Tuesday.

Since his presidential campaign, Trump has vowed to force Canada and Mexico to negotiate the trade deal saying it has been detrimental to the manufacturing industry in the United States, sending shocking waves of uncertainty for the already weakened Mexican economy.

[...] In the years that have followed the NAFT signing, the Mexican government has sold itself as a pro-business and lower-cost alternative for U.S. companies and in the process became a manufacturing powerhouse of cars, computers, aerospace technology and televisions.

However, the modernization process also helped dismantle the national agricultural system, which has practically disappeared, according to analysts and producers.

Source: teleSUR


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @01:41PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @01:41PM (#447841)

    So NAFTA is bad for everybody except the 1%ers in all 3 countries.
    Because NAFTA made it possible to increase profits while simultaneously reducing demand for labor.
    Your underpants gnome logic is impeccable!

  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday December 31 2016, @03:15PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday December 31 2016, @03:15PM (#447860) Journal

    Alright, smart guy - who should profit off of treaties and agreements? Does the world actually belong to the 1%? Is that the correct way of looking at things? Streamline the profiteering of the 1%, and cull most of the remaining 99% to live on the dole? Where does that kind of thinking lead? I really don't now where that road leads ultimately, but along the way, the idle masses are going to wreck the 1% mansions, yachts, private planes, ocean front properties, etc. What do you really think an idle population is going to do with it's time? Look at the inner cities today, and imagine that crap spreading all across the country.

    I guess some people like gangs of thugs roaming their neighborhoods.