Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday December 30 2016, @07:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the we-were-just-kidding-before dept.

Privacy groups have complained to the Federal Trade Commission that Google is encroaching on user privacy through a policy change in June that allows it to combine personally identifiable information with browsing data collected by its DoubleClick digital advertising service.

The complaint, by Consumer Watchdog and Privacy Rights Clearing House, alleged that Google has created "super-profiles" as it can track user activity on Android mobile phones, with an 88 percent market share of smartphones worldwide. The information can also be gleaned "from any website that uses Google Analytics, hosts YouTube videos, or displays ads served by DoubleClick or AdSense," according to the complaint.

The combination of data is in contrast to Google's pledges not to combine users' personally identifiable information with DoubleClick's browsing data when acquiring the ad serving service in 2008, according to the complaint filed Thursday but made public on Monday. In October this year, ProPublica reported that Google "quietly erased that last privacy line in the sand" by its policy change in June that allowed the DoubleClick database of web browsing records to be combined with personal user data.

On June 28, Google users were informed of some new optional features introduced for their account that would give them more control over the data the company collects and how it's used, while allowing the search giant to show more relevant ads. As part of the changes, Google struck out the language in its privacy policy stating that it would "not combine DoubleClick cookie information with personally identifiable information unless we have your opt-in consent," according to the complaint. Existing users were presumably given the chance to opt out, but for new users the combination of personal and browsing data was done by default, it added.

[...] Describing the June move as highly deceptive, the groups said the announcement "intentionally misled users," who had no way to figure from the wording that Google was in fact asking users for permission to link their personal information to data reflecting their behavior on as many as 80 percent of the Internet's leading websites.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by RS3 on Friday December 30 2016, @08:53PM

    by RS3 (6367) on Friday December 30 2016, @08:53PM (#447594)

    Add Privacy Badger to your list. As I also use these and others, if you ever do any Apache/nginx admin and read the server logs, you'll know they can still track you there. Ever click a google result link? It always takes you to google.com, then to the actual site. I wonder why they do that? Could it be that they're just trying to see how effective their search results are? Sure, but they also know you and that you clicked that link. It all gets aggregated, cross-correlated, shared and aggregated, and you're watched. Similar article up today about FB aggregating data and building profiles, including for people who don't have FB accounts. I don't, won't, but I'm a bit scared to check and see what they've compiled on me.

  • (Score: 2) by Celestial on Friday December 30 2016, @08:57PM

    by Celestial (4891) on Friday December 30 2016, @08:57PM (#447595) Journal

    Huh. Thanks for the advice about Privacy Badger. I was under the assumption that it was pretty much redundant with uBlock Origin and Disconnect. I'll look into it.

    Regarding Google search results redirecting, that's why I use Startpage as my primary search engine and DuckDuckGo as my secondary search engine.

    • (Score: 1) by RS3 on Friday December 30 2016, @09:12PM

      by RS3 (6367) on Friday December 30 2016, @09:12PM (#447606)

      Huh. Thanks for the advice about Privacy Badger. I was under the assumption that it was pretty much redundant with uBlock Origin and Disconnect. I'll look into it.

      You're quite welcome, and I forgot to add umatrix too. Yes there's redundancy but can you ever be too safe? :-}

      I was using Ghostery but a few months ago they made a huge update / major change that seemed to "phone home to mommy" and I removed it.

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Friday December 30 2016, @09:01PM

    by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Friday December 30 2016, @09:01PM (#447598) Journal

    I had problems with Privacy Badger in the past, but now I don't even notice it is there (I am often fiddling with uMatrix instead). It is blocking cookies from 6 domains on the BBC, for instance. Good stuff.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 1) by RS3 on Friday December 30 2016, @09:23PM

      by RS3 (6367) on Friday December 30 2016, @09:23PM (#447612)

      Yes, I forgot to mention uMatrix- I have it installed but temporarily turned it off.

      Privacy Badger needs a lot of fiddling. It seems to green-light many domains I don't consider safe (trackers) so I keep uBlock origin and uMatrix going when I'm ever on more troubling websites.

      I usually use Old Opera with javascript and cookies turned OFF and many trackers in the "Blocked Content" list. If a particular site doesn't work well, Old Opera lets me turn on cookies and javascript on a per-site basis. In other words, whitelisting. I've never understood why Old Opera (v12 and back) did not catch on strongly with tech-types.

      • (Score: 2) by takyon on Friday December 30 2016, @09:48PM

        by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Friday December 30 2016, @09:48PM (#447616) Journal

        At the end of the day, if you know what you are doing you need a script blocker like uMatrix more than the cookie blocker. Any fiddling around with uMatrix is offset by the time saved loading less ads and other script crap, and that fiddling goes down as you visit less new domains.

        I used to use Opera v12 long after the expiration date for a few isolated domains. I think I stopped around a year ago. Chrome is my main browser and I split between Firefox Dev Edition and Firefox Portable for other stuff. Vivaldi may be a potential replacement for Opera v12 but I haven't paid too much attention to its development. I think I only use it to comment on NextBigFuture, and rarely. It didn't launch with all the features Opera v12 fans wanted but there have been some major updates since.

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 2) by Aiwendil on Friday December 30 2016, @10:53PM

        by Aiwendil (531) on Friday December 30 2016, @10:53PM (#447640) Journal

        On the subject of Opera12, do try Otter Browser, it has a very similar interface (incl the F12-menu) and you can turn javascript on/off as needed and do per-domain-settings (and has the blocked content feature).

        One quirk with Otter is that the F12-menu only affects current tab (and any tabs you subsequently spawn from it).

        It is qt5-based, so blink as its engine (and works on bloated pages [but with css-animations in currently displaying tab being a cpu-hog])