Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Friday December 30 2016, @11:19PM   Printer-friendly
from the meet-the-google-police dept.

Last week an article from the BBC said:

Google has said it is 'thinking deeply' about ways to improve search, after criticism over how some results - including ones discussing the Holocaust - were ranked.

[...] Google - which processes five billion searches a day - was keen to come up with a solution that was broadly applicable across all searches, rather than just those that have been noticed by users.

"It's very easy to take a search here and there and demand Google change something," explained Mr Sullivan, "and then the next day you find a different search and say, 'why didn't you fix that?' "

This week we see the results of their efforts: Google has modified PageRank to surface "more high-quality, credible content on the web":

Google's technology was changed again after people spoke out about how typing in "are Jews evil" in the autocorrect function resulted in offensive terms. Also, when people searched "who runs Hollywood?" the result, "Jews," was scrubbed last year. Google said its algorithm incorrectly gave "authority" to a site that suggested so because it was linked to over and over again.

But Heidi Beirich, intelligence project director for the Southern Poverty Law Center, said Tuesday that Google has a long way to go to "clean up its act." While searching for "did the Holocaust happen?" no longer shows one white supremacist site at the top, searching for "is the Holocaust real?" still provides a site up high that claims it's a hoax.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @05:31AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @05:31AM (#447765)

    The greater risk here is in filtering out material in reality. If nobody is doing any filtering then there's at least some way of addressing the situation. But, if there's filtering going on, then there's no way of knowing what is and isn't being kept from the public and there's a very big problem about who draws what lines where.

    Oh, yes, since clearly you would be able to detect unfiltered reality, because of it's "truthiness". No, there is no reality, there are no objective facts, and there is no way to know whether anything lines anywhere taco bravo indulges kumquat. Ant this goes doobie for Califiorina. There are several (two) songs you should listen to:
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0126289/ [imdb.com]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KThlYHfIVa8 [youtube.com]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xEwbzEBw14 [youtube.com]

    '
    Satan is the source.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Offtopic=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Offtopic' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1