Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Friday December 30 2016, @11:19PM   Printer-friendly
from the meet-the-google-police dept.

Last week an article from the BBC said:

Google has said it is 'thinking deeply' about ways to improve search, after criticism over how some results - including ones discussing the Holocaust - were ranked.

[...] Google - which processes five billion searches a day - was keen to come up with a solution that was broadly applicable across all searches, rather than just those that have been noticed by users.

"It's very easy to take a search here and there and demand Google change something," explained Mr Sullivan, "and then the next day you find a different search and say, 'why didn't you fix that?' "

This week we see the results of their efforts: Google has modified PageRank to surface "more high-quality, credible content on the web":

Google's technology was changed again after people spoke out about how typing in "are Jews evil" in the autocorrect function resulted in offensive terms. Also, when people searched "who runs Hollywood?" the result, "Jews," was scrubbed last year. Google said its algorithm incorrectly gave "authority" to a site that suggested so because it was linked to over and over again.

But Heidi Beirich, intelligence project director for the Southern Poverty Law Center, said Tuesday that Google has a long way to go to "clean up its act." While searching for "did the Holocaust happen?" no longer shows one white supremacist site at the top, searching for "is the Holocaust real?" still provides a site up high that claims it's a hoax.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @06:23AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @06:23AM (#447775)

    You've made a lot of wrong assumptions about what I'm complaining about and come to some really wrong conclusions.

    If you walk like a duck and talk like a duck, people are going to think you are a duck.
    You've trotted out enough of the typical racist tropes to make anyone who has seen those tropes before conclude that you are indeed a racist. At best a concern-trolling racist. The kind of person who knows just one Dr King quotation, the one about not being judged by the color of their skin. Who's more interested in bending that quote to serve their libertarian fantasies about being "left alone" in a society designed to benefit themselves than they are in actually understanding what Dr King meant.

    If you don't support a particular government agenda to benefit black people, you are a hate group.

    A section of the white population, perceiving Black pressure for change, misconstrues it as a demand for privileges rather than as a desperate quest for existence.

    This has completely nothing to do with what I am saying.

    Sure.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   0  
       Troll=1, Insightful=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 2) by jdavidb on Saturday December 31 2016, @03:27PM

    by jdavidb (5690) on Saturday December 31 2016, @03:27PM (#447862) Homepage Journal

    You've trotted out enough of the typical racist tropes to make anyone who has seen those tropes before conclude that you are indeed a racist

    The illiterate ones, sure.

    --
    ⓋⒶ☮✝🕊 Secession is the right of all sentient beings