Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday January 03 2017, @02:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the plugging-the-swamps-drain dept.

In one of their first moves of the new Congress, House Republicans have voted to gut their own independent ethics watchdog — a huge blow to cheerleaders of congressional oversight and one that dismantles major reforms adopted after the Jack Abramoff scandal.

Monday's effort was led, in part, by lawmakers who have come under investigation in recent years.

Despite a warning from Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), House Republicans adopted a proposal by Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) to put the Office of Congressional Ethics under the jurisdiction of the House Ethics Committee.

The office currently has free rein, enabling investigators to pursue allegations and then recommend further action to the House Ethics Committee as they see fit.

Now, the office would be under the thumb of lawmakers themselves. The proposal also appears to limit the scope of the office's work by barring them from considering anonymous tips against lawmakers. And it would stop the office from disclosing the findings of some of their investigations, as they currently do after the recommendations go to House Ethics.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/house-republicans-gut-their-own-oversight-233111

The Office of Congressional Ethics was established in 2008 under House Democrats, in response to the era of lobbying scandals made notable by Jack Abramoff, the former lobbyist who went to prison on corruption charges.

It is the first independent body to have an oversight role in House ethics. There is no Senate counterpart. The OCE independently reviews allegations of misconduct against House members and staff, and if deemed appropriate refers them to the House Ethics Committee for review. The OCE cannot independently punish lawmakers for any ethics violations.

Update: House Republicans pull plan to gut independent ethics panel after Trump tweets


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 04 2017, @02:42PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 04 2017, @02:42PM (#449369)

    What you argue for on a regular basis is perpetuating an inegaliatarian status quo for no other reason than it is the status quo.

  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Wednesday January 04 2017, @03:58PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Wednesday January 04 2017, @03:58PM (#449400) Homepage Journal

    No, what I argue for is equality of treatment rather than equality of results. The former is actual equality while the latter is just bigotry rebranded.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 04 2017, @04:58PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 04 2017, @04:58PM (#449434)

      Get back to us when you are ready to support a 100% inheritance tax and the raising of children in creches where they all receive equal treatment.

      Until then you are just another bullshitter picking and choosing which people deserve 'equal' treatment and which deserve special privileges.