Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Wednesday January 04 2017, @01:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the still-not-as-tough-as-hair dept.

The hit Disney movie "Moana" features stunning visual effects, including the animation of water to such a degree that it becomes a distinct character in the film.

UCLA mathematics professor Joseph Teran, a Walt Disney consultant on animated movies since 2007, is under no illusion that artists want lengthy mathematics lessons, but many of them realize that the success of animated movies often depends on advanced mathematics.

"In general, the animators and artists at the studios want as little to do with mathematics and physics as possible, but the demands for realism in animated movies are so high," Teran said. "Things are going to look fake if you don't at least start with the correct physics and mathematics for many materials, such as water and snow. If the physics and mathematics are not simulated accurately, it will be very glaring that something is wrong with the animation of the material."

Teran and his research team have helped infuse realism into several Disney movies, including "Frozen," where they used science to animate snow scenes. Most recently, they applied their knowledge of math, physics and computer science to enliven the new 3-D computer-animated hit, "Moana," a tale about an adventurous teenage girl who is drawn to the ocean and is inspired to leave the safety of her island on a daring journey to save her people.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Wednesday January 04 2017, @04:41PM

    by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Wednesday January 04 2017, @04:41PM (#449427) Journal

    The impression I get is that Disney has now divided itself in to the "Frozen Corporation" to cater for girls, and the "Marvel & Star Wars" corporation to appeal to the boys. All their other properties, characters & franchises seem to have been almost completely forgotten. I'm almost surprised to see them come out with a new property instead of just more Frozen shite.

    I say this as someone who absolutely hated Disney for years, but have recently had to grudgingly accept that they do make good films. Much as I would like to hate Frozen and the newer Tinkerbell films I find them very hard to fault, and IMO "Tangled" is just brilliant. The new Marvel and SW stuff is very enjoyable in my opinion too, especially considering how bad we feared it would be.

    I'm not so enamoured of the so called "disney classics" though. I know they are products of an older age but some of them are just awful even considering that. Ever watched the 1953 Peter Pan? Bizarre, confusing, disjointed and not to mention borderline racist. I had a lot of awkward questions to answer from my five year old after watching that one.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by art guerrilla on Wednesday January 04 2017, @05:49PM

    by art guerrilla (3082) on Wednesday January 04 2017, @05:49PM (#449457)

    as per usual, i was the only stick-in-the-mud who didn't lerv frozen... formulaic disney with all the rough edges sanded blandly smooth... one of the major problems i had with it (as with many simplistic, glossed-over disney films), is that there were -ultimately- no consequences for stupid behaviors/decisions... EVERYTHING was eventually solved by -literally- a wave of the magic wand... cheap, easy, no muss, no fuss... what a crock...
    for an example of a childrens animated movie i thought was great (and it obviously had a lot of commercial appeal), despicable me was 10 times better than mindless frozen...