Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Friday January 06 2017, @06:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the lets-monetize-it! dept.

George Brandis, Australia's Attorney General, is inviting submissions on the possible expansion of access to metadata retained under Australia's telco metadata retention laws. Under existing law, telcos are required to retain metadata for two years, which may be used for law enforcement and national security purposes.

However, the committee also indicated that it was aware of the potential for unintended consequences resulting from a prohibition on courts authorising access to data retained under the scheme and recommended that the Minister for Communications and the Attorney-General review this measure.

Rupert's empire published on this last year, the ABC was late to the party with a story on January 5. I wonder if the AG and the communications minster are aware of the potential for unintended consequences resulting from civil access to this metadata.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by bradley13 on Friday January 06 2017, @08:36AM

    by bradley13 (3053) on Friday January 06 2017, @08:36AM (#450144) Homepage Journal

    I find laws like this to be just astounding invasions of privacy. This metadata represents your movement in cyberspace. Imagine requiring every citizen to wear a tracker that records all of their physical movements, and store this for future use "just in case".

    Sure, it's a handy investigative tool, but at what price in privacy and individual freedom? Moreover, what "crimes" will be discovered that will put innocent people in jail? Your WLAN was hacked in a drive-by incident, and used for something illegal? Prove it wasn't you!

    --
    Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by zeigerpuppy on Friday January 06 2017, @10:06AM

    by zeigerpuppy (1298) on Friday January 06 2017, @10:06AM (#450155)

    It's called a mobile phone and you probably already carry one friend.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 07 2017, @02:02AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 07 2017, @02:02AM (#450548)

      No, I don't. Fuck off. Mobile phones are also voluntary.