Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday January 08 2017, @03:42PM   Printer-friendly
from the plight-of-the-working-man dept.

Saudi Arabia has sentenced a group of foreign workers who protested against unpaid wages early last year to 300 lashes and four months imprisonment, exacerbating the already dismal plight of temporary foreign workers in the kingdom.

The men, employed by the construction conglomerates Binladin Group and Saudi Oger, had been waiting for months to be paid. Video footage from their protest in April shows them angrily setting ablaze several buses that belonged to their employers.

[...] Binladen Group, founded by the father of deceased al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, and Saudi Oger, led by Lebanon's Prime Minister Saad Hariri, both claimed they were unable to pay employees after a plunge in oil revenues.

The companies say they completed payment to 70,000 sacked employees at the end of 2016 and that workers who are still with the company would be receiving payments soon.

Source: teleSUR


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by jimshatt on Sunday January 08 2017, @04:30PM

    by jimshatt (978) on Sunday January 08 2017, @04:30PM (#451068) Journal
    Your attorneys can only hold back so many protesters. I'm sure you understand that people can only take so much before taking matters into their own hands. And so they should (wasn't that the whole idea of the 2nd amdt?), especially if that property of yours was built by those very protesters. Don't get all lawful suddenly, you hypocrite.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Sunday January 08 2017, @04:43PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday January 08 2017, @04:43PM (#451071) Journal

    I don't believe that I have ever advocated the destruction of property as a form of "protest". Had these people appropriated property, in lieue of wages owed, then sold that property to get the money due, I might go along with that. But wanton destruction of property is damned hard to justify. The protestors in Ferguson managed to look not terribly bad, for a time. Then, they started burning down the neighborhood, and whatever traces of sympathy I may have had for them evaporated. Occupy Wall Street was mostly a bunch of silly looking kids, but they managed to avoid destroying stuff. So, silly or not, they have retained a lot of empathy and sympathy. When shit gets broken, burnt, or destroyed, then it's no longer a protest - it's a riot. I'm not aware of any set of laws in any land that protect rioters.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 08 2017, @04:52PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 08 2017, @04:52PM (#451073)

      Peaceful protest is for civilized people. Rioting is what happens without civilized people. Stay away from major cities beginning in 2018.

    • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 08 2017, @04:54PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 08 2017, @04:54PM (#451074)

      Riot is the language of the unheard. In KSA these people are definitely unheard, they don't even have the freedom to leave the country because their passports are confiscated [wikipedia.org] by their employers. The idea that they could appropriate the property and sell it themselves while living as slaves is a delusion.

    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Whoever on Sunday January 08 2017, @05:01PM

      by Whoever (4524) on Sunday January 08 2017, @05:01PM (#451076) Journal

      Occupy Wall Street was mostly a bunch of silly looking kids, but they managed to avoid destroying stuff. So, silly or not, they have retained a lot of empathy and sympathy.

      And they got the full force of the police shutting them down, using legal and illegal methods against the demonstrators. Of course, Occupy Wall Street did not have the Koch Brothers supporting them.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 08 2017, @04:46PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 08 2017, @04:46PM (#451072)

    The idea behind the second amendment was that we didn't have a standing army and in most areas we didn't have full time police service. The right to bear arms was so that the states had the weapons needed to ward off Indians and bandits. The people who would be called up for service weren't full time soldiers and they usually brought their own weapons. Same goes for posses, they would bring their own weapons as the town wouldn't have the weapons and ammo to arm them as needed.

    Also, hunting was a much more important task.

    It's misleading to suggest that it was solely intended for the purpose of overthrowing the government at the time. That was just a bonus. Also, considering that there was no standing army and that the rifles of the day were only able to get a shot off without being reloaded, pointy sticks and rocks are viable weapons if you've got numbers.

    • (Score: 2) by physicsmajor on Sunday January 08 2017, @09:18PM

      by physicsmajor (1471) on Sunday January 08 2017, @09:18PM (#451193)

      And yet, within the lifetimes of the Founding Fathers, the 2nd was used to justify private ownership of cannonry.

      Nice try, maybe that'll work on the next folks. Try again.

    • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Sunday January 08 2017, @10:33PM

      by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Sunday January 08 2017, @10:33PM (#451218) Journal

      I would like to hear the source of your claim that the purpose was so that the states would have sufficient weaponry. I suspect you have adopted the official interpretation of the term "militia", which I do not believe was originally intended to have any connection to the government.

      --
      Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
  • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Monday January 09 2017, @01:43AM

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Monday January 09 2017, @01:43AM (#451274) Journal

    His "attorneys" are especially stretched for time and effort because they're filling in for his shrunken, atrophied penis. As the old saw goes: "This is my rifle, this is my gun, one is for shooting, the other fills me with self-loathing and bottomless, gnawing inadequacy."

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...