Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday January 09 2017, @12:58AM   Printer-friendly
from the something-to-hide? dept.

In a surprising and worrying move, the FBI has dropped its case against a man accused of downloading child sex abuse images, rather than reveal details about how they caught him.

Jay Michaud, a middle school teacher in Vancouver, Washington, was arrested in July last year after visiting the Playpen, a dark web meeting place tens of thousands of perverts used to swap mountains of vile underage porn.

Unbeknown to him at the time, the FBI were, for about a fortnight, running the site after taking over its servers, and managed to install a network investigative technique (NIT) on his computer to get his real public IP address and MAC address. The Playpen was hidden in the Tor anonymizing network, and the spyware was needed to unmask suspects – about 1,300 public IP addresses were collected by agents during the operation.

According to the prosecution, a police raid on his home revealed a substantial hoard of pictures and video of child sex abuse on computer equipment. But now, guilty or not, he's now off the hook after the FBI filed a motion to dismiss its own case [PDF] late last month.

Why? Because Michaud's lawyer insisted that the FBI hand over a sample of the NIT code so it could be checked to ensure that it didn't breach the terms of the warrant the FBI obtained to install the malware, and to check that it wouldn't throw up any false positives.

US District Judge Robert Bryan agreed, saying that unless the prosecution turned over the code, he'd have to dismiss the charges. The FBI has since been arguing against that, but has now decided that it's better to drop the case than reveal its techniques.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 09 2017, @02:32AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 09 2017, @02:32AM (#451291)

    Is he? They found pictures on his computer, but they have to prove that the pictures were there and weren't the result of tampering. Whether or not he's actually guilty, his life is pretty much over and he'll never work in education again. Which is fine if he's actually guilty, but if the FBI put the pictures there the way that they gave "terrorists" plans and weapons in order to arrest them for terrorism related crimes, then that's not doing anybody any good.

    Bottom line here is that it's incredibly irresponsible of the media to publish the names of people who have been accused of crimes, but not yet convicted as they might well turn out to not be guilty or are outright innocent of the charges. The prosecutors and cops have a tendency to interpret circumstances in a way that leads them to believe people are guilty, even though the evidence might be lacking. The whole point of jury trials is that the police and prosecution are likely to arrest and charge more people that are actually guilty.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=4, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by black6host on Monday January 09 2017, @04:08AM

    by black6host (3827) on Monday January 09 2017, @04:08AM (#451312) Journal

    I have a friend whose ex accused him of molesting her children. The local newspaper reported that he had been arrested and confessed. He had made no confession. This was front page news. He was self employed and it hurt his business. A few days later a retraction in the paper was made. In the back, in small print. He was eventually acquitted but the damage had been done. The children admitted that his ex put them up to it.

    It's terribly important that we adhere to the innocent until proven guilty system of law that we here in the US enjoy. Sure, a few will get away. More importantly, those who are innocent should be protected. When it comes to children, it doesn't work that way. All someone needs to do is make the accusation. Game over. Sucks.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 09 2017, @05:13PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 09 2017, @05:13PM (#451515)

      It's terribly important that we adhere to the innocent until proven guilty system of law that we here in the US enjoy. Sure, a few will get away. More importantly, those who are innocent should be protected. When it comes to children, it doesn't work that way. All someone needs to do is make the accusation. Game over. Sucks.

      Tell that to all the pizzagate loony's. It's a terrible shame when a regular Joe is *supposedly* set up by the FBI. But some incredibly vague emails from a questionable source equals a global conspiracy.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 09 2017, @09:28PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 09 2017, @09:28PM (#451651)

        Pizzagate is ridiculous, but the actual source isn't that questionable. It's been practically admitted already on numerous occasions that the emails were real.