For the new political order taking shape in Washington, however, H-1Bs aren't quite welcome. Amid promises of sweeping changes to immigration policy, President-elect Donald Trump and his choice for attorney general, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), have tabbed the program for a major overhaul, and might even scrap it altogether. In the House, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is on the same wavelength.
Trump has described H-1Bs as a "cheap labor program" subject to "widespread, rampant" abuse. Sessions co-sponsored legislation last year with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) to effectively gut the program; Issa, a congressman with Trump's ear, released a statement Wednesday saying he was reintroducing similar legislation called the Protect and Grow American Jobs Act.
Sessions and Issa's legislation primarily targets large outsourcing companies, such as Infosys and Tata Consultancy Services, that receive the vast majority of H-1B visas and use them to deploy workers to American companies seeking to cut costs. In 2015, the top 10 recipients of H-1B visas were outsourcing firms. As recently as 2013, the Justice Department, which Sessions stands to take over, settled with Infosys for $34 million in a visa fraud case.
If they were smart they'd change the program to maximize brain-drain from other countries by making H-1B a fast-track to citizenship instead of the 6+ year wait for a green-card that it now is. Bring in the best of them rather than the cheapest of them and let them compete on equal footing rather than the indentured servitude of the current H-1B program.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 11 2017, @01:09AM
I didn't vote for Trump, but overall he's right on H1B's. I've personally seen them used as "abusable" cheap IT labor. The "shortage" claim is bullshit at least half the time.
And, citizens rejected for a position filled by a visa worker should have the right to both know the reason and be able to challenge the decision. Every applicant with a relevant 4 year degree or 5 years of relevant experience should get a notice of rejection, along with their challenge rights.
The burden should be on the company to prove "shortage".
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 11 2017, @01:53AM
experience should get a notice of rejection
Honestly, this is just common courtesy. Instead many just leave you hanging. The only way you find out is if you notice the job was closed out. They then also go out of their way to make themselves very unavailable. No one to call no one to email. Just a random black hole.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 11 2017, @08:48AM
Every applicant with a relevant 4 year degree or 5 years of relevant experience should get a notice of rejection, along with their challenge rights.
But not those without degrees; those people are magically unqualified every single time.