SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the exercise-is-contraindicated-in-heavy-smog dept.
Chinese state censors won't be permitting Pokémon Go and other augmented reality games anytime soon:
Nintendo's hit smartphone app, Pokemon Go, and other augmented reality games are unlikely to be rolled out in China any time soon, after the state censor said it would not license them until potential security risks had been evaluated.
[...] Prompted by "a high level of responsibility to national security and the safety of people's lives and property," the censor, the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television, is coordinating with other government departments to evaluate the game's risks, an industry body said. These risks include the "threat to geographical information security and the threat to transport and the personal safety of consumers", a games panel of the China Audio-video and Digital Publishing Association, which is governed by the censor body, said in a posting on its website.
Some Chinese companies have been developing similar games based on augmented reality and location-based services, prompting the panel to seek advice from the top licensing body, it said.
(Score: 2) by ikanreed on Wednesday January 11 2017, @09:11PM
uh... huh. Pretty ambiguous. Let me answer as many possible interpretations of your post as I can.
If this is about how my post implied more universal acceptance of the cultural norms in question than actually exists and glosses over how many people struggling to change things in China there are: good point. I did oversimplify that.
If this is about how my post glossed over that these unspoken rules are themselves far more complex and reasonable than I gave them credit for: sure. good point. I oversimplified that too.
If this is about how "No. Putting up with a government over-regulating a game is NOT OK" then... yeah. I'm not a fan of doing that. But that wasn't the point of my post.
Most other interpretations call for a "Fuck you too, AC"
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 11 2017, @10:44PM
Possible 4th interpretation (and as it turns out the correct one for I am wise and all knowing *in this matter*): The post was to the ACs replying to ikanreed in an attempt to point out that they were missing ikanreed's point about cultural diversity and moral relativism. The quick jump to sexual mutilation was a type of Godwin, shutting down the conversation before it even started, and that got me involved with this threadfest.
I do like that your misinterpretation resulted in some good points!