Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday January 13 2017, @02:13AM   Printer-friendly
from the something-is-fishy-here dept.

University of California, Los Angeles and Loyola Marymount University researchers tested the DNA of fish ordered at 26 Los Angeles sushi restaurants from 2012 to 2015, and found that 47% of the sushi was mislabeled. Tuna and salmon were generally genuine, but halibut and red snapper were mislabeled in every single instance of 43 and 32 orders, respectively:

A one-year sampling of high-end grocery stores found similar mislabeling rates, suggesting the bait-and-switch may occur earlier in the supply chain than the point of sale to consumers. [...] Over the four-year study, only bluefin tuna was always exactly as advertised. While only one of 48 tuna samples was not tuna, different kinds of tuna occasionally swapped places, including two samples that turned out to be Atlantic bluefin tuna and southern bluefin tuna, species classified as endangered and critically endangered. Out of nine orders of yellowfin tuna, seven were a different kind of tuna, usually bigeye — a vulnerable and overexploited species, the researchers said. Salmon remained a largely safe bet, with only 6 of 47 orders going awry. However, all halibut and red snapper orders failed the DNA test, and in 9 out of 10 cases, diners ordering halibut were served flounder. About 4 in 10 halibut orders were species of flounder considered overfished or near threatened.

Although some short-term studies have suggested that fish fraud is declining due in part to stricter regulations, this study uncovered consistent mislabeling year over year, indicating seafood misidentification is not improving. While the current study took place in Los Angeles, previous studies detected similar problems nationwide, suggesting that the UCLA findings are widely applicable [...] The researchers used DNA barcoding, which uses a partial DNA sequence from a mitochondrial gene, to accurately identify the fish.

Also at CBS Los Angeles.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by Gaaark on Friday January 13 2017, @02:51AM

    by Gaaark (41) on Friday January 13 2017, @02:51AM (#453162) Journal

    It really IS chicken... of the sea.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=1, Funny=3, Total=4
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday January 13 2017, @04:53AM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday January 13 2017, @04:53AM (#453185) Homepage

    Tuna is great, even when canned and ultra-fishy. The only people I know who don't like canned tuna are women.

    Perhaps it hits them a little too close to home, if you catch my drift.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 13 2017, @02:35PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 13 2017, @02:35PM (#453312)

      Tuna is gross, I'll take smoked salmon anytime. If it smells like fish it's usually either bad or it's not fish.. nudge nudge.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 13 2017, @04:54PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 13 2017, @04:54PM (#453362)

        Aaaaaaaah bet she does, I bet she does, say no more, say no more, know whatahmean, nudge nudge?

        • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Friday January 13 2017, @06:48PM

          by Gaaark (41) on Friday January 13 2017, @06:48PM (#453397) Journal

          What's it like?

          I mean, for the nerds here who don't know.

          Amiright?! :)))

          --
          --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
  • (Score: 2) by meustrus on Friday January 13 2017, @02:49PM

    by meustrus (4961) on Friday January 13 2017, @02:49PM (#453318)
    --
    If there isn't at least one reference or primary source, it's not +1 Informative. Maybe the underused +1 Interesting?