Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Sunday January 15 2017, @12:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the tokin'-effort dept.

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine released a 337-page report about the health effects of cannabis. Unfortunately, the Schedule I status of cannabis makes good studies hard to come by, so we know almost nothing truly definitive:

A report [DOI: 10.17226/24625] published Thursday by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine analyzed more than 10,000 studies to see what could conclusively be said about the health effects of all this marijuana. And despite the drug's increasing popularity — a recent survey suggests about 22 million American adults have used the drug in the last month — conclusive evidence about its positive and negative medical effects is hard to come by, the researchers say.

According to the report, that's at least partly because the federal drug enforcement agency's designation of the drug as a Schedule I substance — having "no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse" — entails so many restrictions that it has been difficult for researchers to do rigorous research on marijuana. We just need "far more information," Dr. Marie McCormick, chair of the NAS committee and professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School, tells Shots.

The report found evidence that cannabis is effective for treating chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Smoking it doesn't appear to increase the risk of cancers associated with tobacco use, but might increase cardiovascular risk. Frequent cannabis smoking is associated with some respiratory problems.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 15 2017, @03:38PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 15 2017, @03:38PM (#454094)

    Is that a subtle grant application to do some original empirical research?

  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday January 15 2017, @03:43PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday January 15 2017, @03:43PM (#454096) Journal

    Hell no, I'm not buying your next bag of grass. Get a haircut and get a real job! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j0xq62AGdk [youtube.com]

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 15 2017, @04:04PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 15 2017, @04:04PM (#454102)

      not buying your next bag of grass

      "Hey, Mom."
      "What do you need, Ophelia? Let me guess. You were caught selling grass again?"
      "No, 'cause it isn't 1972."

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 15 2017, @04:08PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 15 2017, @04:08PM (#454106)

        The troll was right!