SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The tightest molecular knot ever has been created, using 192 atoms:
In a feat that breaks one of the most obscure world records in science, a team of chemists has created a microscopic circular triple helix, or put in more simple terms, the tightest knot ever made. Researchers in Manchester in the UK built the knot from a strand of atoms which curls around in a triple loop and crosses itself eight times. Made from 192 atoms linked in a chain, the knot is only two millionths of a millimetre wide – around 200,000 times thinner than a human hair.
[...] The tightness of a knot is defined by the distance between points where the rope, string – or chain of atoms, in this case – cross each other. For the Manchester group's circular triple helix, each crossing point is a mere 24 atoms apart. "That's very, very tight indeed," said Leigh. "It is definitely the most tightly knotted physical structure known."
Building molecular knots has become something of a passion for Leigh. The latest knot beats the record his own team set four years ago when they created a so-called pentafoil knot from 160 atoms. That knot bested an even earlier effort called a trefoil knot [DOI: 10.1002/anie.201105012] [DX] with three crossing points. "There are actually billions of different knots known to mathematicians," Leigh said in a comment that hinted at a busy future.
Also at Science Magazine and NPR.
Braiding a molecular knot with eight crossings (DOI: 10.1126/science.aal1619) (DX)
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday January 16 2017, @02:24PM
I'll take the tack that: the knottiness of this little structure has nothing to do with its utility. Lots of small chemical structures have catalyst properties, without knots in their structure.
I can see utility in a bigger knot that might partially capture things inside its loops (sort of a leakier version of a buckyball) - but as you approach the "just can't get any smaller" limit - the War song did come to mind.
Not to say the researchers should stop what they are doing - just that they might be a little fixated on this particular feature of the chemicals they are interested in, and over-selling their utility. Hung up on a concept, tied down by their thinking, etc.
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 3, Insightful) by c0lo on Monday January 16 2017, @04:40PM
Really? It wouldn't be a first in which the spatial structure of a molecule [wikipedia.org] is strongly related to its catalytic properties.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford