SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The fine bastards at Cambridge bring us this bit o fucking science:
As dishonesty and profanity are both considered deviant they are often viewed as evidence of low moral standards. On the other hand, profanity can be positively associated with honesty. It is often used to express unfiltered feelings and sincerity. The researchers cite the example of President-elect Donald Trump who used swear words in some of his speeches while campaigning in last year's US election and was considered, by some, to be more genuine than his rivals.
Dr David Stillwell, a lecturer in Big Data Analytics at the University of Cambridge, and a co-author on the paper, says: "The relationship between profanity and dishonesty is a tricky one. Swearing is often inappropriate but it can also be evidence that someone is telling you their honest opinion. Just as they aren't filtering their language to be more palatable, they're also not filtering their views. "
The international team of researchers set out to gauge people's views about this sort of language in a series of questionnaires which included interactions with social media users.
In the first questionnaire 276 participants were asked to list their most commonly used and favourite swear words. They were also asked to rate their reasons for using these words and then took part in a lie test to determine whether they were being truthful or simply responding in the way they thought was socially acceptable. Those who wrote down a higher number of curse words were less likely to be lying.
Guess that makes me the most honest motherfucker on the site, eh?
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 18 2017, @05:36PM
As has been pointed out repeatedly Trump lies and takes credit for things he didn't do. Keep drinking the kool-aid my man, you can tell your grandkids how you supported and promoted Trump as you cook you ratmeat over the fire.
(Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Wednesday January 18 2017, @09:58PM
And that's different from every other politician, how? Why do you think the politicians are so terribly upset about all the leaks and social media puncturing their carefully manufactured personae? It's because there's no there, there. If you were, say, Linus Pauling and were elected senator, you could always point to the real science you did. Heck, even Sonny Bono could point to more actual accomplishments than nearly all the rest of his colleagues. They are empty suits, and lying and taking credit for things they didn't do is pretty much the entirety of their resumes.
Washington DC delenda est.
(Score: 2) by linkdude64 on Thursday January 19 2017, @04:17PM
"As has been pointed out repeatedly Trump lies and takes credit for things he didn't do."
The one thing he did do is take $1mil and turn it into $Xbil. If you think he "fooled/deceived/raped the money" into multiplying itself a thousand times over, you can argue with numbers until you run out of breath.