Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Wednesday January 18 2017, @01:31PM   Printer-friendly
from the this-article-is-rated-pg-13 dept.

The fine bastards at Cambridge bring us this bit o fucking science:

As dishonesty and profanity are both considered deviant they are often viewed as evidence of low moral standards. On the other hand, profanity can be positively associated with honesty. It is often used to express unfiltered feelings and sincerity. The researchers cite the example of President-elect Donald Trump who used swear words in some of his speeches while campaigning in last year's US election and was considered, by some, to be more genuine than his rivals.

Dr David Stillwell, a lecturer in Big Data Analytics at the University of Cambridge, and a co-author on the paper, says: "The relationship between profanity and dishonesty is a tricky one. Swearing is often inappropriate but it can also be evidence that someone is telling you their honest opinion. Just as they aren't filtering their language to be more palatable, they're also not filtering their views. "

The international team of researchers set out to gauge people's views about this sort of language in a series of questionnaires which included interactions with social media users.

In the first questionnaire 276 participants were asked to list their most commonly used and favourite swear words. They were also asked to rate their reasons for using these words and then took part in a lie test to determine whether they were being truthful or simply responding in the way they thought was socially acceptable. Those who wrote down a higher number of curse words were less likely to be lying.

Guess that makes me the most honest motherfucker on the site, eh?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by linkdude64 on Thursday January 19 2017, @04:12PM

    by linkdude64 (5482) on Thursday January 19 2017, @04:12PM (#456088)

    I agree with everything you say, however I still take issue with this:

    "I wouldn't trust her to guard a bag of dog turds for five minutes. Everything about her says liar and crook."

    If you or anyone is still "trusting your gut" when it comes to Clinton or Trump, you're doing it wrong.

    As a Trump voter, I would never state that I disliked Clinton because "Everything about her says liar and crook." I would say, "I can provide written and verifiable evidence that Hillary Clinton knowingly assisted the arming of ISIL by negotiating weapon sales to Saudi Arabia through her position at the State Department under the Obama Administration in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation."

    Sure sounds a hell of a lot more convincing than "Drumpf is a sexist! He said attractive women are attractive! His hair is stupid too! What a racist!" Which is really what I have a problem with.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday January 19 2017, @07:26PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday January 19 2017, @07:26PM (#456166) Homepage Journal

    Oh those are easy enough to provide what with all those leaked emails. Facts just weren't the topic of discussion today.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.