Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Wednesday January 18 2017, @04:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-free-as-in-beer dept.

It doesn't look like the Talos Secure Workstation will see the light of day with it's crowdfunding campaign ending this week and it's coming up more than three million dollars short of its financing goal. [Editor note: It did not meet the funding goal.] Now there's another effort to offer a libre system but using off-the-shelf x86 hardware.

[...] Libreboot developer Leah Rowe is now launching a libre system out of the ashes of the Talos Secure Workstation. She wrote in an email to Phoronix, "It's a high-end desktop/server platform, available in either configuration. It also supports virtualization and PCI passthrough, unlike older systems, so Qubes would be compatible...TALOS looks set to fail. Crowd Supply has removed it from their homepage, and Raptor Engineering is writing up an announcement that TALOS is shutting down - they are going to link to Minifree and tell people to purchase Libreboot D16 from me."

But before getting too excited, this isn't a new platform but rather an existing AMD server motherboard that simply comes pre-loaded with Libreboot to free the firmware/BIOS and then loaded with Debian GNU/Linux. The desktop and server versions make use of an AMD Opteron 6272, a.k.a. the older 32nm "Interlagos" CPUs derived from Bulldozer and released back in 2011.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 18 2017, @05:28PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 18 2017, @05:28PM (#455535)

    It's clear from recent years that current computing giants are going to be producing inherently broken systems; the only viable solution is to take your ball and go to a different court.

    It would be nice to see those who are interested in the libre philosophy put all of their effort into pushing a fundamentally libre computing system from the ground up—sure it will be shit at first, but what is the alternative? 6-year old (and ever aging) tech that is getting no improvement?

    The future is RISC-V, or something like it. Please, put your brains behind that. Let's escape, a grovel no more.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +5  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=4, Total=5
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday January 18 2017, @06:19PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday January 18 2017, @06:19PM (#455578) Journal

    I wish I still had mod points.

    RISC-V or something like it is the only way that the public will be able to protect itself at the hardware level.

    If a state actor, including your own government, can compromise your system security at the hardware level, then we're all skroowed.

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
  • (Score: 2) by Arik on Thursday January 19 2017, @01:13AM

    by Arik (4543) on Thursday January 19 2017, @01:13AM (#455823) Journal
    I think it would be great to be able to buy a truly free and open computer, even if it was older technology. How far back do you have to go to get a chip where all the patents have expired? They still make 386s for embedded applications and IIRC they cost less than $2 per. Stick 12 on those on a motherboard for $24... it's the motherboard that would wind up being a pain to design and execute I would guess. And the OS. Still, done right it could be very functional, and not require anything under patent, right?
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 20 2017, @06:09AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 20 2017, @06:09AM (#456413)

      As long as the tech can be developed by "the community", then that's fine. It's the ability to improve in a particular direction that is valuable; current tech is a totally captured.