Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday January 19 2017, @12:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the the-cost-of-running-a-go-to dept.

In a December 12 exposé occupying two full spreads in Guangzhou's Southern Metropolis Daily, reporters Rao Lidong (饶丽冬) and Li Ling (李玲) carefully documented their successful attempts to obtain personal information about consenting colleagues through "tracking" services advertised online.

For a modest fee of 700 yuan, or about 100 dollars, the reporters were able to obtain an astonishing array of information based on one colleague's personal ID number, including a full history of hotel rooms checked into, airline flights taken, internet cafes visited, border entries and exits, apartment rentals, real estate holdings — even deposit records from the country's four major banks.

But that wasn't all. The reporters were also able to purchase live location data on another colleague's mobile phone, pinpointing their position with disturbing accuracy.

Hundreds of tracking services are advertised on internet-based platforms in China, offering clients the power to unlock, with as little as a phone number or ID, the personal data of just about any Chinese citizen. You can find them on Tencent's WeChat and QQ services, on the Taobao online marketplace and on Weibo. And while some of these services are unreliable or outright fraudulent, others are able to deliver accurate information from what must be national police and government databases, as well as from banks and mobile carriers.

In other words, through a simple mobile transaction, you, too, can be Big Brother.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by bob_super on Thursday January 19 2017, @05:24PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday January 19 2017, @05:24PM (#456109)

    Nope. I've met enough humans to know that I wouldn't want many of them to know too much about me or my family.
    And I'm not a good-looking woman.

    The people with official full access to my data are supposed to have accountability, but there's already too many of them.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by davester666 on Friday January 20 2017, @08:18AM

    by davester666 (155) on Friday January 20 2017, @08:18AM (#456440)

    and there is virtually no accountability. It generally amounts to "don't let me catch you doing this again" [not "don't do this again"].