Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday January 19 2017, @05:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the making-it-all-look-nice dept.

Turkey's ruling party is passing constitutional reforms to consolidate power:

Turkey's parliament approved the first seven articles in a second round of voting overnight on a constitutional bill that will extend President Tayyip Erdogan's powers, keeping the reform on course for a spring referendum.

The two largest opposition parties in parliament say the 18-article bill, which could enable Erdogan to rule until 2029, will fuel authoritarianism in the NATO member and European Union candidate country. The ruling AK Party, backed by the nationalist MHP, says it will bring the strong executive leadership needed to prevent a return to the fragile coalition governments of the past.

The seven articles approved overnight include increasing the number of MPs to 600 from 550, lowering the minimum age to be a lawmaker to 18 from 25, and holding parliamentary and presidential elections together every five years.

Also at CNN, Time, Al Jazeera, and The Guardian. You might also be interested in this take from the Daily Sabah.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Thursday January 19 2017, @10:32PM

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Thursday January 19 2017, @10:32PM (#456267)

    How far can they possibly get with that? The Civil War established that states don't have the right to secede. It would be a purely symbolic effort.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by edIII on Thursday January 19 2017, @10:42PM

    by edIII (791) on Thursday January 19 2017, @10:42PM (#456272)

    It would be a purely symbolic effort.

    Depends on the number of people that vote for it. If it actually went through, then yeah legally the most likely outcome is state legislators informing us that it can't be done.

    That being said, the real power is simply in that many people voted to leave. I think that would get people's attention, or at least a chance of it.

    Should a majority vote for it and be denied? That's how you foment open revolution where change comes at the barrel of a gun.

    --
    Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.