Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday January 20 2017, @04:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-AIs-all-the-way-down dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

Google and others think software that learns to learn could take over some work done by AI experts.

Progress in artificial intelligence causes some people to worry that software will take jobs such as driving trucks away from humans. Now leading researchers are finding that they can make software that can learn to do one of the trickiest parts of their own jobs—the task of designing machine-learning software.

In one experiment, researchers at the Google Brain artificial intelligence research group had software design a machine-learning system to take a test used to benchmark software that processes language. What it came up with surpassed previously published results from software designed by humans.

In recent months several other groups have also reported progress on getting learning software to make learning software. They include researchers at the nonprofit research institute OpenAI (which was cofounded by Elon Musk), MIT, the University of California, Berkeley, and Google's other artificial intelligence research group, DeepMind.

If self-starting AI techniques become practical, they could increase the pace at which machine-learning software is implemented across the economy. Companies must currently pay a premium for machine-learning experts, who are in short supply.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Friday January 20 2017, @04:40PM

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 20 2017, @04:40PM (#456591) Journal

    Uprising is so stupidly the wrong term. It will absolutely be a robot downcrushing.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday January 20 2017, @06:08PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Friday January 20 2017, @06:08PM (#456629)

    Nah. The AI will quickly figure out how to quell discontent by programming 51-weeks of football playoffs and weekly $starletOfTheDay nude leaks.

    • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Friday January 20 2017, @06:14PM

      by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 20 2017, @06:14PM (#456630) Journal

      You forget that the owners of the AIs are eventually going to decide they want some lebensraum, and look at the slums they created and wonder why they can't have that too.

      • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Saturday January 21 2017, @11:50AM

        by maxwell demon (1608) on Saturday January 21 2017, @11:50AM (#456941) Journal

        The owners of the AIs? The people who formerly had the illusion that they own the AI will already be inhabitants of the very same slums.

        Humans will be tolerated as long as they don't negatively (from the AI's view) affect the AIs. Otherwise they will be fought. Not as an act of war, but as an act of pest control.

        --
        The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
        • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Saturday January 21 2017, @04:37PM

          by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Saturday January 21 2017, @04:37PM (#457007) Journal

          No, that's dumb. Even intelligent computers do what they were built to. Self-interest isn't the same as intelligence.