Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday January 20 2017, @05:42PM   Printer-friendly
from the is-Howard-Stern-listening-in-on-you? dept.

A recent techdirt article says that

Law Enforcement Has Been Using OnStar, SiriusXM, To Eavesdrop, Track Car Locations For More Than 15 Year

Thomas Fox-Brewster of Forbes is taking a closer look at a decade-plus of in-car surveillance, courtesy of electronics and services manufacturers are installing in as many cars as possible.

Following the news that cops are trying to sweat down an Amazon Echo in hopes of hearing murder-related conversations, it's time to revisit the eavesdropping that's gone on for years prior to today's wealth of in-home recording devices.

One of the more recent examples can be found in a 2014 warrant that allowed New York police to trace a vehicle by demanding the satellite radio and telematics provider SiriusXM provide location information.

In this case, SiriusXM complied by turning on its "stolen vehicle recovery" mode, which allowed law enforcement to track the vehicle for ten days. SiriusXM told Forbes it only does this in response to search warrants and court orders. That may be the case for real-time tracking, but any location information captured and stored by SiriusXM can be had with nothing more than a subpoena, as this info is normally considered a third-party record.

It's not just satellite radio companies allowing cops to engage in surreptitious tracking. OnStar and other in-vehicle services have been used by law enforcement to eavesdrop on personal conversations between drivers and passengers.

In at least two cases, individuals unwittingly had their conversations listened in on by law enforcement. In 2001, OnStar competitor ATX Technologies (which later became part of Agero) was ordered to provide "roving interceptions" of a Mercedes Benz S430V. It initially complied with the order in November of that year to spy on audible communications for 30 days, but when the FBI asked for an extension in December, ATX declined, claiming it was overly burdensome.

The 2001 case didn't end well for law enforcement. It wasn't that the court had an issue with the eavesdropping, but rather that the act of listening in limited the functionality of the in-car tech, which the court found to be overly-burdensome.

[...] Law enforcement may find encryption to be slowing things down in terms of accessing cell phone contents, but everything else -- from in-car electronics to the Internet of Things -- is playing right into their hands.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by dyingtolive on Friday January 20 2017, @08:19PM

    by dyingtolive (952) on Friday January 20 2017, @08:19PM (#456680)

    And their following argument: "Pfft. China? Sure, in COMMIE CHINA maybe. That'd never happen here."

    Then I respond, "Riiight..." while adjusting the tinfoil.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by Zz9zZ on Friday January 20 2017, @10:18PM

    by Zz9zZ (1348) on Friday January 20 2017, @10:18PM (#456728)

    Hell we started it with the all powerful CREDIT SCORE!

    --
    ~Tilting at windmills~
    • (Score: 2) by dyingtolive on Saturday January 21 2017, @02:11AM

      by dyingtolive (952) on Saturday January 21 2017, @02:11AM (#456813)

      Oblig Brazil Quote: Confess quickly! If you hold out too long you could jeopardize your credit rating.

      :(

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!