Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Monday January 23 2017, @06:29PM   Printer-friendly
from the great-tunnel-of-china dept.

China is reinforcing the Great Firewall with a 14-month crackdown on unauthorized VPNs:

Beijing has launched a 14-month nationwide campaign to crack down on unauthorised internet connections, including virtual private networks (VPN) services – a technology that allows users to bypass the country's infamous Great Firewall. A notice released by China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology on Sunday said that all special cable and VPN services on the mainland needed to obtain prior government approval – a move making most VPN service providers in the country of 730 million internet users illegal. The "clean up" of the nation's internet connections would start immediately and run until March 31, 2018, the notice said.

Also at NYT and Time.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by bob_super on Monday January 23 2017, @07:37PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Monday January 23 2017, @07:37PM (#457758)

    > Even Russia has given up on trying to censor the net. I can't understand why China remains so adamant about this.

    Why is the US still waging a war on pot, and starting a new one on facts?
    In the case of China, it's definitely about control, since any "real news" about the party members doing improper things threatens the almighty Stability.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by Lagg on Monday January 23 2017, @08:36PM

    by Lagg (105) on Monday January 23 2017, @08:36PM (#457787) Homepage Journal

    The pharmaceutical companies have every incentive and every resource to keep weed illegal because they are the world's most unethical drug dealers. One of the companies (besides an unnamed alcohol manufacturer collective) that funded the anti-prop 205 campaign here in AZ - the one that pushed complete lies and non-science read off a prompt by our clearly bought mayor in their commercials - was a fentanyl manufacturer ( http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-08/fentanyl-maker-donates-big-to-campaign-opposing-pot-legalization [usnews.com] ). The war on drugs continues because of things like that and because people with no experience with drugs or addiction continue to see addicts as evil people with no self-control. Leaving a vast weakness in public opinion that makes it pretty fucking trivial to keep the cycle going.

    Also our government hates psychadelics because some of them including Psilocybin solve issues like alcoholism in timeframes of doses rather than full treatment plans. Hence them being terrified and slow to fund more research. It hurts the pharma companies they're deeply in the pockets of. I also assume that they don't like the whole "mind freeing" thing that good drugs in general tend to provide. But it's not just a matter of anything like that. As always it's mostly about monies.

    --
    http://lagg.me [lagg.me] 🗿
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 23 2017, @09:31PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 23 2017, @09:31PM (#457812)

      Hallelujah money!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDUrpPvU1_4 [youtube.com]

      I don't much enjoy the song, but the lyrics are quite the indictment of our culture. The simple fact that money == superiority in the minds of many many people is a huge problem. People literally will believe a billionaire over a PhD in the field, such incredible stupidity.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 23 2017, @09:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 23 2017, @09:11PM (#457806)

    You call it a war on facts; I call it alternative facts.

    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Monday January 23 2017, @09:51PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Monday January 23 2017, @09:51PM (#457813)

      While I love the expression, I have a grave concern: Typical Alternative Current goes back and forth between positive and negative.
      How could we possibly ever hear an equal amount Negative Facts from The Dearly Beloved Leaderissimo, since we will always be winning?