Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Tuesday January 24 2017, @08:25PM   Printer-friendly
from the 30,000-50,000-robots-rejoice dept.

The New York Times (may be pay-walled) reports that Terry Gou, the CEO of Foxconn has confirmed rumours aired in December to the effect that the company is considering building an additional factory in the United States. Yahoo Finance UK says that the factory, if built, "could create about 30,000-50,000 jobs." The South China Morning Post reports that the facility, expected to cost more than $7 billion, would make dot-matrix displays (such as used in television sets and mobile phones) under the Sharp name. Mr. Gou remarked that:

While it is difficult to have a clear analysis of the economic outlook for this year, due to looming uncertainties, three factors can be seen as clues. First, the rise of protectionism is inevitable. Secondly, the trend of politics serving the economy is clearly defined, and thirdly, the proportion of real economy is getting increasingly bigger.

Speaking in November, Gou had called on the incoming U.S. leaders to refrain from protectionist policies, The China Post had reported.

Additional coverage:

Related:
Foxconn Plans to Replace Nearly All Human Workers With Robots in Some Factories
Foxconn Acquires Sharp at a Lower Price Than Previously Agreed
Sharp Accepts $6.25 Billion Takeover Bid from Foxconn, but Foxconn is Wary of Debt
Softbank to Invest $50 Billion in the US


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 25 2017, @12:34AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 25 2017, @12:34AM (#458352)

    > Just think... the Chinese shit you pay low prices for: what does it add to your life?

    Food, clothing, furniture. Pretty much all the daily stuff.

    > And how much cheaper would it be if the CEO and high executives didn't take such big salary's and bonuses.

    I don't see anyone trying to fix that.

  • (Score: 2) by Sulla on Wednesday January 25 2017, @01:59AM

    by Sulla (5173) on Wednesday January 25 2017, @01:59AM (#458365) Journal

    The prices for food would not change all that much with a greater level of protectionism, especially when in competition with China. It was only in the past few years when the FDA okayed the processing of chicken in China, but they still had to be American chickens.

    I do not have a lot of money. Two infants and a wife, life with a family member with dementia to take care of her. Wherever I can I buy American, even if it costs more money. I buy local and shop at family owned shops when they are within reason. Depending on the product you are better paying vastly more for American over cheap imports. I saved up 400 and bought a pair of Whites Smokejumpers, a boot which is completely rebuildable and made in the USA. With moderate use I have gone three years without any issues or repairs except for applying oil, I imagine it will be another three before I need to get them resouled at a cost of 70 bucks. This is a much better deal than a new pair of tennis shoes for 15-20 bucks once a month.

    We can compete, people just need to think about it harder.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 25 2017, @08:02AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 25 2017, @08:02AM (#458413)

      I guess I have to be explicit - "china" is a proxy for "all other foreign countries" take a look at the labels of your food, not just chickens. Lots of frozen vegetables come from outside the US. And if there is not a "made/grown in usa" label then it is definitely of foreign origin.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 25 2017, @03:46AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 25 2017, @03:46AM (#458381)

    You're not saving if you're buying clothes and furniture daily.

    As for food you really don't want to eat the Chinese shit (in some case this might literally involve shit). In 2011 the Chinese Gov claimed that 10% of farmland was contaminated, more recently they said it was 20%. What is the real figure by USA standards?