Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Tuesday January 24 2017, @08:25PM   Printer-friendly
from the 30,000-50,000-robots-rejoice dept.

The New York Times (may be pay-walled) reports that Terry Gou, the CEO of Foxconn has confirmed rumours aired in December to the effect that the company is considering building an additional factory in the United States. Yahoo Finance UK says that the factory, if built, "could create about 30,000-50,000 jobs." The South China Morning Post reports that the facility, expected to cost more than $7 billion, would make dot-matrix displays (such as used in television sets and mobile phones) under the Sharp name. Mr. Gou remarked that:

While it is difficult to have a clear analysis of the economic outlook for this year, due to looming uncertainties, three factors can be seen as clues. First, the rise of protectionism is inevitable. Secondly, the trend of politics serving the economy is clearly defined, and thirdly, the proportion of real economy is getting increasingly bigger.

Speaking in November, Gou had called on the incoming U.S. leaders to refrain from protectionist policies, The China Post had reported.

Additional coverage:

Related:
Foxconn Plans to Replace Nearly All Human Workers With Robots in Some Factories
Foxconn Acquires Sharp at a Lower Price Than Previously Agreed
Sharp Accepts $6.25 Billion Takeover Bid from Foxconn, but Foxconn is Wary of Debt
Softbank to Invest $50 Billion in the US


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday January 25 2017, @12:38AM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Wednesday January 25 2017, @12:38AM (#458355) Journal

    Yes, the plan, that's been in the works since 2014, has always been a maximally automated facility to take advantage of cheaper shipping.

    It was in the news at the time, maybe even posted here. Foxconn Weighs Plan for U.S. Plant (Jan. 26, 2014) [wsj.com]

    So I guess the news is that they continue to mull.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday January 25 2017, @01:41AM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday January 25 2017, @01:41AM (#458362) Journal

    They were weighing, now they're mulling.

    I love how the article is almost exactly 3 years old, although I couldn't confirm the automation details due to the WSJ paywall.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 25 2017, @08:07AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 25 2017, @08:07AM (#458416)

      So its not just me.
      I used to be able to go right through their paywall due to all my privacy extension in firefox.
      But in the last month I've hit it a couple of times.

    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday January 25 2017, @03:42PM

      by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Wednesday January 25 2017, @03:42PM (#458507) Homepage
      If the summary can be believed regarding the factories being for displays, then Foxconn already have form for 100% automated display production lines (whilst 100% believable for assembly lines, I'm unsure if actual component production has been so automated yet, something may have been lost in translation):

      "There are 10 lights-out (fully automated) production lines at some factories, including table one in Chengdu, AIO (all-in-one) PC and LCD monitor lines at a factory in Chongqing, western China, and a CNC line in Zhengzhou, Dai indicated."
      https://9to5mac.com/2016/12/30/foxconn-fully-automated-factories-robots-automated-production/
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves