Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Thursday January 26 2017, @02:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the DNA-three-way dept.

Researchers at The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) claim to have created the first stable semisynthetic organism with extra bases added to its genetic code. The single-celled organism is also able to continually replicate the synthetic base pair as it divides, which could mean that future synthetic organisms may be able to carry extra genetic information in their DNA sequences indefinitely.

The cells of all organisms contain genetic information in their DNA as a two-base-pair sequence made up of four molecules – A, T, C, G (Adenine, Cytosine, Thymine, and Guanine). Each of these is known as a nucleotide (consisting of a a nitrogenous base, a phosphate molecule, and a sugar molecule) and are specifically and exclusively paired, so that only A is coupled to T and C is coupled with G. These nucleotides are connected in a chain by the covalent (electron-coupled) bonds between the sugar of one nucleotide and the phosphate of the next, which creates an alternating sugar-phosphate "backbone."

The team from TSRI have added two synthetic bases that they call "X" and "Y" into the genetic code of a E.coli carrier organism – a single-cell bacteria – and then chemically tweaked it to live, replicate, and survive with the extra DNA molecules intact.

The paper is available via PNAS:
Yorke Zhang, et al.,A semisynthetic organism engineered for the stable expansion of the genetic alphabet (DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616443114)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by ikanreed on Thursday January 26 2017, @02:57PM

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 26 2017, @02:57PM (#458943) Journal

    Are there RNA molecules that match up to these nucleotides? If not, it's just random chemical garbage injected into DNA, right?

    If the polymererase hits an X or a Y during transcription, what happens?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 26 2017, @03:52PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 26 2017, @03:52PM (#458965)

    lp0 on fire?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 26 2017, @04:12PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 26 2017, @04:12PM (#458972)

    If the polymererase hits an X or a Y during transcription, what happens?

    One would expect that it would be flagged as DNA damage and "repaired" (not sure if procaryotes have repair pathways for this, but in eucaryotes they are present).

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 26 2017, @10:30PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 26 2017, @10:30PM (#459185)

      If you RTFA, you'll see that the claim to fame isn't that they got the new bases into DNA, that's been done before, it's that they've rejiggered the needed protein machinery to make the bases persist over generations. It doesn't do anything but take up space, yet, but this is the first step.