Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday January 26 2017, @11:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-called-marketing dept.

Wearable baby monitors that can send real time updates to smartphones are unregulated devices that may be causing stress and unnecessary hospital visits, according to an article published in JAMA:

Specifically, the authors cite the Baby Vida, MonBaby, Owlet, Snuza Pico, and Sprouting wearables, which cost anywhere from $150 to $300 each. The idea is that if you're in the next room over while your baby is napping, you can simply look at your phone for reassurance that your baby is still breathing without you staring at them.

The devices are not regulated by the FDA, researchers point out, and in order to stay that way (and presumably, also avoid problems with the Federal Trade Commission) they don't make specific claims about their ability to prevent sudden infant death or distress. Owlet, for example, says, "We can't promise to prevent SIDS right now, it's an unknown issue but... we believe notifying parents when something's wrong maybe can help." That's similar to Baby Vida, which states in its marketing, "What sound does your baby make if he or she stops breathing?"

New parents, often sleep-deprived and navigating a haze of contradictory advice from well-intentioned sources, are particularly susceptible to doing everything they can "just in case." "These devices are marketed aggressively to parents of healthy babies, promising peace of mind about their child's cardiorespiratory health," pediatrician Dr. Christopher P. Bonafide, with the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, said. "But there is no evidence that these consumer infant physiological monitors are life-saving or even accurate, and these products may cause unnecessary fear, uncertainty and self-doubt in parents."

For starters, the authors note that nobody actually knows if the apps even work properly. Wearable sensor tech may not be entirely accurate for adults, let alone kids. One blood pressure app, the authors write, inaccurately told nearly 80% of participants with hypertension that their blood pressure was in the normal range.

Also at CBS.

The Emerging Market of Smartphone-Integrated Infant Physiologic Monitors (DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.19137) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 27 2017, @01:47AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 27 2017, @01:47AM (#459255)

    "There's no evidence" doesn't mean it won't work. There's no evidence for a lot of things. Sometimes we trust logic and reasoning, even without evidence. And what was that study that said most medical results are not reproducible? Sheesh.

    Personally, I don't want our child to start her life under that kind of surveillance, but if you want to use a monitor, go ahead. Just be sure to change the password.

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Friday January 27 2017, @01:48AM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Friday January 27 2017, @01:48AM (#459256) Journal

    Just be sure to change the password.

    Like hell they will do that! Baby Botnet! Russian parenting!

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 27 2017, @02:04AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 27 2017, @02:04AM (#459266)

      Don't underestimate the potential creep factor. [google.com]

      • (Score: 2) by tibman on Friday January 27 2017, @02:42PM

        by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 27 2017, @02:42PM (#459469)

        And industry wonders why IoT isn't taking off like expected.

        --
        SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.