Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday January 29 2017, @07:58AM   Printer-friendly
from the he's-not-even-original dept.

Fake news is everywhere. The power of the press is said to be waning. And because the nation's most famous populist—the man with his sights on the presidency—can't trust the lying media, he says, he has no option but to be a publisher himself.

Oh yeah, and the year is 1896.

The would-be president in question is William Jennings Bryan. In an era before the internet, television, or radio, the best way to reach the masses is with newsprint. So, without the option of tweeting his grievances after losing the election to William McKinley, what does Bryan do? He starts his own newspaper. And he uses it to rail against "fake news."

I don't need to tell you a lot of this sounds weirdly familiar.

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/01/the-fake-news-crisis-120-years-ago/513710/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Bogsnoticus on Monday January 30 2017, @05:52AM

    by Bogsnoticus (3982) on Monday January 30 2017, @05:52AM (#460531)

    Bullshit. That is just him making excuses because his ego is extremely wounded by not winning the popular vote as well.

    He keeps making claims about voter fraud, but can never produce the evidence of it.

    --
    Genius by birth. Evil by choice.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday January 30 2017, @08:12AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 30 2017, @08:12AM (#460562) Journal

    Bullshit. That is just him making excuses because his ego is extremely wounded by not winning the popular vote as well.

    He is correct no matter how wounded his ego is here. It is misleading to claim Clinton should have won because of the popular vote, when no one was trying to win the popular vote.