Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Sunday January 29 2017, @12:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the stop-thinking-that-you're-a-dictator dept.

The Intercept reports

A Federal judge in New York issued a nationwide temporary injunction [1], halting the implementation of President Donald Trump's executive order on immigration on Saturday night, blocking the deportation of travelers with valid visas detained at airports in the past 24 hours.

Judge Ann Donnelly, a United States District Court Judge in Brooklyn, issued the ruling at an emergency hearing on a lawsuit [2] filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups on Saturday, as Trump's executive order temporarily banning citizens of seven nations with Muslim majorities from entering the U.S. took immediate effect.

The judge ruled that the government must immediately stop deporting travelers from those nations, including refugees who already went through a rigorous vetting process, and provide a complete list of all those detained, immigrants rights lawyer Lee Gelernt told reporters in Brooklyn.

[Ed Note (martyb): Original text and links from The Intercept are reproduced here — to bypass indirections and Javascript use the following links.]

[1] Direct link to a PDF of the Emergency Motion for Stay of Removal (Case 1:17-cv-00480 Document 8 Filed 01/28/17).
[2] Direct link to a PDF of the Original ACLU Complaint (Case 1:17-cv-00480 Document 1 Filed 01/28/17).

Previously:
Breaking News: Immigration Ban Includes Green Card Holders


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @07:02PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @07:02PM (#460348)

    Does the eastern distric of New York have authority to issue nationwide injunctions?

    Runaway, Runaway, why do you persist? Surely it must be obvious to you by now that there are things you do not understand and are better off just not commenting on?

  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday January 29 2017, @07:28PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday January 29 2017, @07:28PM (#460369) Journal

    LOL, what a 'tard. It's obvious from my question that I don't understand the levels of the various federal courts. I ASKED. Some of our members chose to respond with informative comments. It's you, the 'tard, who wants to stifle discussion.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @08:18PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @08:18PM (#460383)

      You are a child, Runaway, and it is tiresome for the adults on SoylentNews to constantly have to stop the discussion to explain rather basic things to you. So if you could, preferably, just remain obscene and not heard? Just to facilitate the discussion?

      • (Score: 0, Flamebait) by Runaway1956 on Sunday January 29 2017, @10:24PM

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday January 29 2017, @10:24PM (#460429) Journal

        You, Sir, may fuck off and die, anytime.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @11:15PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @11:15PM (#460441)

          Again, how mature of you. But wait, how mature are you actually? Do you find you have problems remembering people's names? Have you ever recently been unsure what city or town you were in? Perhaps you should seek professional help. We all wish you the best, and hope you get better.

      • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Monday January 30 2017, @02:37AM

        by Phoenix666 (552) on Monday January 30 2017, @02:37AM (#460484) Journal

        For what it's worth, I am ignorant of how those things work, too. So for me the question is a legitimate request for knowledge. The polite thing to do, the helpful thing to do, would be to answer it succinctly and forthrightly. And, no, RTFM is not an appropriate answer in this case because TFM is very, very long and arduous reading, and Google will be of no real help. And even if you found a lawyer online to ask, chances are they'd be at odds with the next lawyer in line, at which point they'd devolve into an endless, desultory argument replete with minutiae and arcana, exchanged at a slowly growing volume. At least, that's been my experience with anything that's ever come out of a lawyer's mouth.

        So, how about be a mensch and give the guy (and me, and others) a straight answer, if you know it, instead of jumping on another cheap opportunity to slam the guy?

        --
        Washington DC delenda est.