Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday January 30 2017, @05:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the soon-it'll-be-IE dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

The respected Firefox add-on developer Quicksaver announced yesterday that he won't update any of his extensions anymore because of Mozilla's decision to move to WebExtensions exclusively. Quicksaver, responsible for add-ons such as Tab Groups, OmniSidebar, FindBar Tweak, Beyond Australis and Puzzle Bars, had four of his five add-ons for Firefox featured by Mozilla in the past.

If you open any of the author's add-on pages on the Mozilla Add-ons repository, you will notice an important announcement on the page. It reads:
IMPORTANT: The add-on will not receive any more updates and will stop working by next November with Firefox 57.

[...] Quicksaver posted an explanation on his website that reveals why he made the decision to stop add-on development. There are several reasons, but the core reason given is that at least four of his five add-ons rely heavily on functionality that will either not be provided by WebExtensions, or would require him to rewrite the extension almost completely.

[...] Quicksaver is not the only author who announced that he will stop working on add-ons for Firefox. Add-ons like New Tab Tools, Classic Theme Restorer, Tree Style Tabs, Open With, DownThem All, KeeFox and many others are likely also not going to make the cut.

Source: http://www.ghacks.net/2017/01/28/firefox-add-on-quicksaver-quits/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by frojack on Monday January 30 2017, @09:10AM

    by frojack (1554) on Monday January 30 2017, @09:10AM (#460578) Journal

    Vivaldi has more customization than you can shake a stick at.
    Firefox is dead.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Magic Oddball on Monday January 30 2017, @11:00AM

    by Magic Oddball (3847) on Monday January 30 2017, @11:00AM (#460592) Journal

    Does Vivaldi let us change themes or at least force it to color–match our operating system theme? Last I heard, users had no option regarding its appearance, which isn't acceptable given I hate the “revenge of the Windows XP designers” look.**

    **I have a pet theory that the people who designed XP's built–in ‘Luna’ theme got jobs at Google & Apple in order to get revenge on everyone that compared Luna to Fisher–Price toys. “Let’s see how you like it when it's utterly flat and takes over not only your desktop OSes, but software, phones and websites so you can’t get away from it! Bwahahahahaha!!!”

    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Monday January 30 2017, @06:01PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Monday January 30 2017, @06:01PM (#460725)

      > I hate the “revenge of the Windows XP designers” look

      *looks at his "classic windows" 2D unaccelerated boring Win98-looking theme with no transparencies or animations*
      *Checks his Folding@Home GPU contribution*
      *Wonders if anything of value is missing*

    • (Score: 1) by toddestan on Wednesday February 01 2017, @03:56AM

      by toddestan (4982) on Wednesday February 01 2017, @03:56AM (#461542)

      The thing is, Luna was anything but flat and colorless like things are now. The taskbar, start menu, window borders, title bars, etc. all had gradients and a rounded appearance to give things kind of a 3D look. It did have the problem that some things, like the start button, didn't actually look like a button, but really the biggest problem was the garish colors and the fact they just way overdid it. Microsoft really didn't adopt the flat look until Windows 8.

  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30 2017, @06:21PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30 2017, @06:21PM (#460731)

    Except that it is proprietary with free software components. That, to me, makes it worthless.