Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Tuesday January 31 2017, @11:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the god-is-pleased dept.

Not only in America, teaching evolution is under attack. Indeed, future Turkish children will likely not learn about evolution in school, as soL international reports:

İsmet Yılmaz, the Minister of National Education in Turkey on Friday announced the new curriculum draft for school. After the draft is finalized, textbooks will be published based on the new draft to be used starting from 2017-2018 academic year.

The new curriculum draft brings some radical changes:

[...] Evolution Theory is excluded from Biology courses. The related unit named "The Origins of Life and the Evolution" is replaced with "Living Beings and Environment".

This is actually not the first strike against evolution in Turkey:

In 2013, the government had made a regulation, which let the Intelligent Design model to be included in the curriculum besides the Evolution Theory.

Also at Turkish Minute: Gov't removes evolution theory from new school curriculum

Related: What is Turkey's problem with Darwin?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by NewNic on Tuesday January 31 2017, @08:46PM

    by NewNic (6420) on Tuesday January 31 2017, @08:46PM (#461414) Journal

    What part of "early colonists" didn't you understand?

    --
    lib·er·tar·i·an·ism ˌlibərˈterēənizəm/ noun: Magical thinking that useful idiots mistake for serious political theory
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Tuesday January 31 2017, @10:51PM

    by VLM (445) on Tuesday January 31 2017, @10:51PM (#461473)

    Also it was one dude's opinion which was wildly disagreed with at the time, used rhetorically in a treaty with Islamic arabs who were operating under this quote from wikipedia:

    It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave;

    People of the book have some protection officially under some interpretations of Islam. The USA not being like the UK or the papal states in Rome, the US isn't technically Christian, so in the treaty we're just rhetorically not BSing the arabs, yo our nation is not christian or islamic just so we're on common ground here about who we claim to be and who you think you are. So no turning around and BSing us that ships from Rhode Island are fair game but Massachusetts are safe or the other way around, no claiming people from R.I. are "people of the book" but people from NYC are not, etc.

    To troll progressives you can point out that this treaty quote is analogous to how Trump saying his moslem ban is constitutional is also the controversial opinion of exactly one dude so imagine in 2500 people thinking Trump said something in 2017 therefore the prog who's being trolled must have agreed with Trump and thats how the USA always has been and always will be interpreted.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 01 2017, @02:23AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 01 2017, @02:23AM (#461524)

      To troll progressives you can point out that this treaty quote is analogous

      No, you can not, you fucking Nazi!

  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday January 31 2017, @11:13PM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Tuesday January 31 2017, @11:13PM (#461477) Homepage
    Wait a sec - you introduce an irrelevancy that does not contradict your parent poster's point, and then you complain when he tries to bring it back to one of the things he was talking about? If you want a thread about the early colonists, start your own.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves