Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday February 01 2017, @02:39AM   Printer-friendly
from the all-that-glitters dept.

Gold's glimmer is not the only reason the element is so captivating. For decades, scientists have puzzled over why theoretical predictions of gold's properties don't match up with experiments. Now, highly detailed calculations have erased the discrepancy, according to a paper published in the Jan. 13 Physical Review Letters.

At issue was the energy required to remove an electron from a gold atom, or ionize it. Theoretical calculations of this ionization energy differed from scientists' measurements. Likewise, the energy released when adding an electron — a quantity known as the electron affinity — was also off the mark. How easily an atom gives up or accepts electrons is important for understanding how elements react with other substances.

"It was well known that gold is a difficult system," says chemist Sourav Pal of the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, who was not involved with the study. Even gold's most obvious feature can't be explained without calling Einstein's special theory of relativity into play: The theory accounts for gold's yellowish color. (Special relativity shifts around the energy levels of electrons in gold atoms, causing the metal to absorb blue light, and thereby making reflected light appear more yellow.)

With this new study, scientists have finally resolved the lingering questions about the energy involved in removing or adding an electron to the atom. "That is the main significance of this paper," Pal says.

Source: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/chemists-strike-gold-solve-mystery-about-precious-metals-properties


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by fritsd on Wednesday February 01 2017, @04:25PM

    by fritsd (4586) on Wednesday February 01 2017, @04:25PM (#461679) Journal

    Well gold is a metal, and that means that the atoms share their outer electrons with all the other ones, so you can't really speak of the size of a molecule of gold anymore. The whole lump is the molecule.

    If it's crystalline then you can speak of the size of a unit cell (smallest replicating unit). But that's not monoatomic.

    And I haven't a clue what it has to do with Sumerian or Babylonian gods.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2