Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday February 01 2017, @11:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the who-buys-discs-these-days? dept.

Sony has written down $977 million in its movie business, blaming a decline in physical media sales:

In a Monday statement to investors, the company attributed the "downward revision... to a lowering of previous expectations regarding the home entertainment business, mainly driven by an acceleration of market decline." [...] "The decline in the DVD and Blu-ray market was faster than we anticipated," Takashi Iida, a Sony spokesman, told Bloomberg News.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by citizenr on Wednesday February 01 2017, @02:55PM

    by citizenr (2737) on Wednesday February 01 2017, @02:55PM (#461657)

    like Ghostbusters and Angry Birds, you know, the quality stuff ...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by takyon on Wednesday February 01 2017, @03:30PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday February 01 2017, @03:30PM (#461663) Journal

    The Angry Birds Movie
    Budget $73 million
    Box office $349.8 million

    Ghostbusters (2016 film)
    Budget $144 million
    Box office $229.1 million

    Hollywood accounting aside, these films are still enabled by the ticket buyers.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by VLM on Wednesday February 01 2017, @03:49PM

      by VLM (445) on Wednesday February 01 2017, @03:49PM (#461668)

      The power of narrowcasting... ghostbusters total haul divided by $16/ticket at my local theater and half to Sony means 42M viewers.

      Assuming ALL the viewers are in the USA that means almost 90% of the population wouldn't watch, its just too stupid for them. Look at the IQ curve and think of that 10th percentile way over on the left side... Of course its not quite that simple.

      The media is having serious psychological issues converting from being culturally relevant leaders decades ago that everyone watched, to a weird subculture almost no one cares about and is far past cultural escape velocity WRT being relevant to the general population yet still remains profitable, like pulp novels or pro wrestling or cosplay, they just kinda do their own thing while being mostly ignored by the majority culture. Watching the media's decline over the course of my life is pretty amazing.

      Kids these days don't know how TV defined America in like the 70s and of course now a days TV is just a screen saver while people play on their phones. You tell a kid today that the entire country went to cosplay events in the 70s and they're like F you old man not fooling us. But seriously, no shit, like the entire country watched MASH and watched the MASH finale, like almost as high of a percentage as people who vote. Yeah nobody watches TV today, a top series might have a tenth of the population watch and 90% ignore it, but in the old days literally everyone watched the same TV shows. Hmm I bet every 80s boy watched the A team and Knight Rider. There isn't any cultural touchstone like that today.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Gaaark on Wednesday February 01 2017, @04:50PM

      by Gaaark (41) on Wednesday February 01 2017, @04:50PM (#461684) Journal

      Hollywood accounting aside, these films are still enabled by the ticket buyers.

      Hollywood accounting aside, these films are still enabled by stupid, stupid people.

      --
      --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 02 2017, @07:21AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 02 2017, @07:21AM (#461915)
        There's nothing wrong with catering for the stupid. There are lots more stupid people than smart people.

        But if you're supposedly doing it for profit and you're losing money then you're clearly doing things wrong.

        If you're in a Democracy remember the votes of stupid people are often worth as much or even more than yours. So unless you're actually amongst the ruling elites and looking down on the stupid people from your palaces and jets, you shouldn't look down on stupid people ;).