Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday February 01 2017, @06:06PM   Printer-friendly
from the breathing-a-sigh-of-relief dept.

The lungs you were born with are not necessary to sustain your life:

In what is believed to be the first procedure of its kind in the world, doctors in Canada have saved a young mother's life by resorting to a radical solution – they removed her lungs for six days while she waited for a transplant. In April, Melissa Benoit arrived at a Toronto hospital with a severe lung infection. Doctors soon realised that Benoit, who had been born with cystic fibrosis, had just hours to live, leading them to consider the unprecedented approach.

[...] In mid-April, a team of 13 began a nine-hour surgery to remove Benoit's lungs. Filled with mucous, each lung was swollen and as hard as a football, said Keshavjee. "Technically, it was difficult to get them out of her chest." Hours later, her condition began to dramatically improve. "And literally within minutes – it was probably around 20 minutes after having taken those infected lungs out – her blood pressure normalised, and they could remove all the blood-pressure-supporting drugs and just leave her on the pumps that were providing the circulation," Keshavjee told the Canadian Press.

A small artificial lung was connected to Benoit's heart, while other devices oxygenated and circulated her blood. As they waited for replacement lungs to become available, doctors wondered how long she could be supported like this. "We didn't know if we'd get [them] in one day or one month," said Keshavjee. Six days later a pair of donor lungs became available and Benoit underwent a successful lung transplant.

Also at BBC.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by GungnirSniper on Wednesday February 01 2017, @11:38PM

    by GungnirSniper (1671) on Wednesday February 01 2017, @11:38PM (#461840) Journal

    If we didn't have caps on med schools and students the problem would largely solve itself in the US. A 'free market', indeed.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 02 2017, @04:27AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 02 2017, @04:27AM (#461881)
    I don't think it would solve itself that way.

    The US system has more layers with many layers out to extract profit.

    The US also has the poor sitting in ERs to get treatment. That's an expensive and inefficient way to deliver healthcare (if you're not rich enough to have your own personal medical team this sort of thing can still affect you).

    Do also include the costs of the US prison system. Some US people commit crimes: a) to get money to pay for healthcare, b) to get into prison to get healthcare.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 02 2017, @07:30AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 02 2017, @07:30AM (#461918)

      The US system has more layers with many layers out to extract profit.

      Had to read twice: looked like "lawyers" the first time.

      • (Score: 1) by Kawumpa on Thursday February 02 2017, @08:30AM

        by Kawumpa (1187) on Thursday February 02 2017, @08:30AM (#461931)

        Mee too, and it would have been correct. :)