SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
posted by
janrinok
on Friday February 03 2017, @05:05AM
from the should-have-had-it-in-writing dept.
from the should-have-had-it-in-writing dept.
The AAP via the Herald Sun (News Corp) reports on a deal between the Australian government and the former U.S. administration. Under the arrangement, people seeking asylum in Australia—who have, controversially, been detained in centres on Nauru and on Manus Island in Papua New Guinea—would have been resettled in the United States. However, according to the story, the plan is now in question due to the change in leadership there.
According to The Guardian , "the U.S. could resettle zero refugees from Manus Island and Nauru and still be 'honouring' the deal."
related story:
Manus Island Centre Deemed Illegal; Detainees Seek Compensation
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Australian Government Asks U.S. to Take Detainees
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 39 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Graduate life: It's not just a job. It's an indenture.
(Score: 2) by HiThere on Friday February 03 2017, @07:55PM
No, if they're following your plain they are clearly a failed country. E.g. you are stating clearly that adequate education isn't required, and implying that it probably isn't available.
Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 04 2017, @06:06AM
You know, the thing about pronouns is that a pronoun is supposed to stand in for a noun, so as to avoid needless repetition of the noun. It should be quite clear which noun has been replaced by a pronoun. If it is not clear, you should use the noun.
I don't have a fucking clue who is following a "plain" (plan?) or which country you think has failed.