SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the witty-connection-between-chips,-fries,-and-[Big]-Macs dept.
Apple, which makes its own ARM SoCs for its mobile products such as iPhones and iPads, is planning to include ARM chips in Mac laptops alongside Intel CPUs. The ARM chips will handle various tasks during power conservation modes:
Apple Inc. is designing a new chip for future Mac laptops that would take on more of the functionality currently handled by Intel Corp. processors, according to people familiar with the matter. The chip, which went into development last year, is similar to one already used in the latest MacBook Pro to power the keyboard's Touch Bar feature, the people said. The updated part, internally codenamed T310, would handle some of the computer's low-power mode functionality, they said. The people asked not to be identified talking about private product development. It's built using ARM Holdings Plc. technology and will work alongside an Intel processor.
Although Apple only accounted for 7.5 percent of worldwide computer shipments in the fourth quarter, according to data from IDC, the Mac line has long set the standard for design and component improvements. Its feature additions often start new technology trends that other manufacturers rush to follow. Apple and Intel declined to comment. [...] Apple engineers are planning to offload the Mac's low-power mode, a feature marketed as "Power Nap," to the next-generation ARM-based chip. This function allows Mac laptops to retrieve e-mails, install software updates, and synchronize calendar appointments with the display shut and not in use. The feature currently uses little battery life while run on the Intel chip, but the move to ARM would conserve even more power, according to one of the people.
Do you think we will see Dell, Acer, ASUS, et al. produce mainstream dual-processor laptops? How about big.LITTLE clusters in Chromebooks?
Also at Ars Technica, TechCrunch, and Computerworld.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by tangomargarine on Friday February 03 2017, @07:26PM
since computers are a evolution and a architecture cannot be restarted, as from scratch, every new generation incorporates
the previous in some form.
There's no technical reason you can't do this. Hell, with sufficient determination I bet you could wire wrap [wikipedia.org] an 8086 (they have a picture of an actual wire-wrapped z80 in that article; that's 8-bit and 8086 is 16, though).
Making things from scratch in the computing world isn't as impossible as it sounds--it may be a huge, enormous, gigantic pain in the ass, but it's still possible. One might remember that guy [wikipedia.org] who was insisting that it was impossible for Linus Torvalds to have written his own OS without plagiarizing Minix, and the book he published on the topic was universally derided, even by some of the people he (mis)quoted.
Of course, trying to market a brand new processor architecture for the general consumer market these days would most likely crash and burn for marketing reasons. But that's a separate argument.
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"